Albums |
Screenshots |
Videos |
Communicate |
Friends |
Chalkboard |
VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real Ones
This is a discussion on VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real Ones within the EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football forums.
|
||||||
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series | |
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun | |
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors? |
|
Thread Tools |
05-11-2011, 08:58 PM | #41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
Last edited by Warren Piecee; 05-11-2011 at 11:03 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|
05-11-2011, 09:14 PM | #42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
If you do not think my thread is worthwhile why did you take the time to read a good part of it and make post in reply to it yourself? As I write this you are one of 1,705 people who have shown interest in the thread and viewed it. In fact, since you have made one of the 40 posted replies to it you are among the most interested of those of the 1,705 who have expressed interest in the thread. Thank you for your interest. Last edited by Warren Piecee; 05-11-2011 at 11:08 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
05-11-2011, 09:28 PM | #43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
I have already mentioned that a player with a monster vertical jump, It is ironic that some use the board to argue that players on the team they follow are not rated as high as they should be. One of my working assumptions is that EA makes less of an effort to match the player in the game with the actual player on the team than most believe. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
05-11-2011, 09:47 PM | #44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
Last edited by Warren Piecee; 05-14-2011 at 11:49 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
05-12-2011, 01:14 PM | #45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rookie
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
The top receivers are as follows: 1. Boykin 2. Coale 2a. Davis 3. Coles Dyrell has that compartment syndrome and there isn't really a timetable on his return. He's said he's about 70%, but that's pretty optimistic for the severity of that injury. At this point I'm leaving him off the depth chart because there may be a chance he won't play this season. Just all depends on how that heals up until August. Davis has been establishing himself as Logan's favorite target, he may not be the best but he is the favorite. Reason is those two guys worked with the 2's the last two springs and now this spring is essentially their third season working together. He feels more comfortable with him since Tyrod generally worked with Jarrett and Danny. Not taking away from those guys, but he's definitely felt more comfortable. Also just because Marcus wasn't a 5* doesn't mean he isn't a good player. Danny was a 2* guy and Roc Carmichael who was drafted was a 2* guy. You'll also remember Kam Chancellor was a QB coming out of high school. So while three years ago maybe he wasn't considered a top receiver by Tech's coaches, his athleticism has always been there. He's a 4.4 40-yard guy with a 40-inch vertical and absolutely has an NFL body. Mike Gentry has these guys getting in shape so don't be deceived by what Rivals tells you. Wait a year for these guys to develop in Tech's strength program. Also you mention nothing proven behind David at RB, to a degree that's true but Josh Oglesby is a redshirt senior and has backed up Darren, Ryan and now David this season. So he's to say the least experienced, plus he's a good hard runner and had a lot of respect from Billy Hite. Also while he was technically playing fullback it wasn't in the strictest sense of the word. It's kind of like how GT does their RB's with difference letter assigned, so while he was a FB it wasn't like he was just blocking downfield the whole time. Coale is the punter and Frank has said he's the leader going into August. Logan Thomas now has three springs under his belt and has exceeded the expectations of QB's coach Mike O'Cain. He warants an 86 and don't be surprised if he deserves a ratings boost depending on what happens during the season. To the OP: 1. Mark Leal should be in the game. Ricardo Young got hurt in spring practice, he will be out until they start back up and Leal has been progressively moving up the ranks to take the No. 2 job. Obviously Clayton and Young still have time to prove themselves, but from what Frank has said Leal is certainly in the mix. 2. On that point, Clayton is too high I would rate him in the 70-75 range and put Leal maybe a point or two higher. Ju-Ju disappointed the coaches this spring and O'Cain is still looking for that No. 2 spot which really should have been securely held by Ju-Ju. 3. I would bump Wilson maybe a point up because he has had an incredible spring. Had three touchdowns in one of the scrimmages and all while running track in addition to football. James Hopper needs a point or two boost, has looked good in the spring. 4. Randall Dunn needs to be up in the 70-75 range, has made huge strides the spring in the receiving department and has positioned himself to take the No. 1 job if he continues to play this well. Has a great chemistry with Logan and could provide a good receiving option Tech hasn't seen since Jeff King. Not to discount Andre Smith either, but he was more red zone and a blocking TE. 5. Boykin is underrated needs to be at least a 90. I would bump Davis down a few notches, while physically he is an absolute beast he's not better than Coale at this point. Dyrell needs a point decrease, that compartment syndrome he's got is still affecting him and he missed all of spring ball. Xavier Boyce also isn't on the team right now because of a pending child endangerment case. 6. On defense the only glaring thing I noticed is Jack Tyler's 84 rating and being rated ahead of Barquell Rivers. I'm not sure if you've got that mixed up, but Barquell has been ahead of Jack in the depth chart and has played pretty damn well this spring for that quad injury he had. Also if you remember Bud called out Jack on his play in the Orange Bowl where he missed several assignments, hence why Stanford had some pretty big runs. His play tailed off at the end of last year, and he's got to improve this fall to get back. 7. Coale is rated way too high as a punter. One 50+ yard kick is nice, but he's still a three-step technique as Frank said so I'd bump him down to mid-70's. Also Coale as a 99 PR guy is incorrect, you can't rate him the same as Jayron. He may be the most reliable guy back there, but not a 99 if you're rating Jayron as that too. I know it's all a prediction, just thought I'd give my thoughts. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|
05-13-2011, 09:47 PM | #46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
Last edited by Warren Piecee; 05-13-2011 at 09:56 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
05-14-2011, 06:20 PM | #47 |
MVP
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
in my game, they're all going to be replicas of the real thing after i download a custom roster.
__________________
My score for Madden 13: 4.5/10 3 points for graphics, 1 point for the passable commentary, and a half point for the boxart. I can give no further points since the all over the place gameplay would ruin it anyway. |
05-14-2011, 09:46 PM | #48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pro
|
Re: VT Hokies 2011 Roster as Case Study on How Closely Video Game Players Match Real
Last edited by Warren Piecee; 05-14-2011 at 10:38 PM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
«
Operation Sports Forums
> Football
> EA Sports College Football and NCAA Football
»
Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 PM.
Top -
|