Stanford or USC?

[UofL23]

Quote: Originally Posted by franch1se

I'll definitely take SC's promising QB, LB and RB youth over 'Furds anyday. Also keep into consideration tradition and entrances etc. I don't know if Stanford has a custom intro or not but SC does for sure with Traveler etc.

Dude are you serious you think Barkley is better then Luck?

Stanford.

[CraZcane]

Quote: Originally Posted by UofL23

Dude are you serious you think Barkley is better then Luck? Stanford.

did you see his avatar? lol

[spyder_DG]

Quote: Originally Posted by UofL23

Dude are you serious you think Barkley is better then Luck? Stanford.

You do realize he was referring to USC's future at QB...as in Scroggins, Wittek and my personal fav Kessler....obviously Luck is better then Barkley even the biggest USC homer won't argue that but you get Barkley and or Luck for at most two years then have to move on. USC's QB prospects > Stanford's...as for SC only being better at DB and WR.......SC has better RB's, TE's, DL and LB's for the future then the Furd...OL is probably a slight edge to Stanford just based on SC's lack of depth....

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by CraZcane

did you see his avatar? lol

Quote: Originally Posted by UofL23

Dude are you serious you think Barkley is better then Luck? Stanford.

In a rush to make the homer call, I think you guys missed his point.

[d11king]

I'm telling you bro, USC is the choice you want to make. Like someone said, after Luck leaves, it's gonna be back to the drawing board. USC will get better recruits, just because they are USC.

Though, Stanford has been kicking our *** in recent years

[moylan1234]

how either school recruits in real life is irrelevant. Any school especially another cali school can easily become USC in terms of their recruiting in this game. Luck will be fun to play with and with their lower prestige it will be more fun building them up, I'd go with Stanford

[d11king]

Quote: Originally Posted by moylan

how either school recruits in real life is irrelevant. Any school especially another cali school can easily become USC in terms of their recruiting in this game. Luck will be fun to play with and with their lower prestige it will be more fun building them up, I'd go with Stanford

Ohh yeah thats right, cause USC finishes in the Top 5 if not Top 10 in recruiting every year in real life, and you pretty much see that in the game, while Cal in the game pulls about maybe 3-4 5 star recruits and you see that in the game as well. No team in California can become USC in terms of recruiting. You have to go undefeated for like 4 years just to probably finish over SC in recruiting for a year.

UCLA, Cal, Stanford, . USC, :

Biased opinion haha

[franch1se]

Quote: Originally Posted by UofL23

Dude are you serious you think Barkley is better then Luck? Stanford.

Quote: Originally Posted by CraZcane

did you see his avatar? lol

did you miss where i said YOUNG talent. Barkley and Luck are upperclassmen.