Statistical Look at Progression (Ongoing)

[uofm1508]

Quote: Originally Posted by Mtneer08

Looks like its going to be too much of an even playing field with all the 90+ rated players in year 4 and on. I just wish EA would make the players ratings like college hoops 2k8. Im still playing that game because the recruting is so perfect and i dont even like college basketball that much.

Not sure that conclusion can be reached yet

Depends totally on what the other ratings are. If players have high overalls because of a high awareness rating but all the other ratings are proper then it will be fine.

Now if 10 qbs all have 90+ throw power and accuracy every season there might be an issue

[DerkontheOS]

300+ 90s is just plain ridiculous...... NCAA 11 had perfect progression, what happened?

[EvanRG]

Quote: Originally Posted by DerkontheOS

300+ 90s is just plain ridiculous...... NCAA 11 had perfect progression, what happened?

Percentage-wise it's about 3.5% of the players in the game. It's all personal preference, but we'll see, I guess.

[DerkontheOS]

I'm in 2016 and I have noticed LBs have really low awareness.

[aliefallstar]

Quote: Originally Posted by EvanRG

Percentage-wise it's about 3.5% of the players in the game. It's all personal preference, but we'll see, I guess.

yea thats somewhere less than 3 per team on average. I would would an average team to have something like that....

[EvanRG]

For example, the team I am "controlling" throughout this sim experiment is Ohio University (a C+ overall) and the best player on my team in season 4 was an 81 overall.

[Tecmo Bowl]

Considering that out of the box there were 190 or so players rated over 90, 300 seems kinda high. Hopefully there are more years that drop into the 100s. But having one guy do this for 30 years is not enough. You would need to run many sets of 30 years to make this scientific. To at least make it show a pattern I would say at least 5, minimum.

[EvanRG]

Season 5 is updated.