NCAA 14 - Prestige Ratings

[LambertandHam]

Quote: Originally Posted by JDakathebest

but a team like utah is 4* it just seems crazy to me that pitt is only 3*

If Shell would have stayed, along with a big question mark at QB I guess. Pitt had some solid recruits in this last class, want to see Boyd on the field.

[cparrish]

Quote: Originally Posted by [email protected]

Ok I understand you now. Maybe it should be called 'visibility" or "stature" being the term prestige is misleading in that context. It usually refers to historical succes.

I agree completely as I too think calling it "prestige" is extremely misleading.

[War34Eagle]

Quote: Originally Posted by cparrish

As of right now Texas has the #1 and Notre Dame the #6 rated recruiting classes for 2014. Again, the prestige rating is only for recruiting and nothing else. Like I said, it has absolutely nothing to do with on the field performance.

Depending on who you look at Auburns recruiting has either gotten better or at least stayed the same the past 4-5 years though. smh... I just get the feeling someone at EA just sits there and says "oh, Texas, they're usually a top 10 team, right?" And then "Utah, don't hear about them much so they can't get rated too high".

[mailman2]

Quote: Originally Posted by War34Eagle

Depending on who you look at Auburns recruiting has either gotten better or at least stayed the same the past 4-5 years though. smh... I just get the feeling someone at EA just sits there and says "oh, Texas, they're usually a top 10 team, right?" And then "Utah, don't hear about them much so they can't get rated too high".

Yeah I mean that what gets me POed. When I see that prestige changes on a year by year basis I assume they are being neglectful.

[War34Eagle]

Quote: Originally Posted by War34Eagle

Depending on who you look at Auburns recruiting has either gotten better or at least stayed the same the past 4-5 years though. smh... I just get the feeling someone at EA just sits there and says "oh, Texas, they're usually a top 10 team, right?" And then "Utah, don't hear about them much so they can't get rated too high".

Even though I'm bashing EA here though, I really do think they out out a very good product. Maybe it's more of my college football fandom and not the actual game, but the series year in and year out has the most, what's it called, replay value?, of any series of video games. I can't tell you how much time I've put into them going back to NCAA 07, and I know a lot of people here have more hours than me, just for sheer enjoyment. So while I may jab at EA here and there, I just wanted to give a tip of the cap to them on delivering a solid game.

[mailman2]

Quote: Originally Posted by War34Eagle

Even though I'm bashing EA here though, I really do think they out out a very good product. Maybe it's more of my college football fandom and not the actual game, but the series year in and year out has the most, what's it called, replay value?, of any series of video games. I can't tell you how much time I've put into them going back to NCAA 07, and I know a lot of people here have more hours than me, just for sheer enjoyment. So while I may jab at EA here and there, I just wanted to give a tip of the cap to them on delivering a solid game.

If your anything like me your really exciting about this coordinator cam. I really want to check this out on my big screen.

[The JareBear]

I have no problem with Stanford at a 6. They have earned it, IMO

[smack23011]

Saw some guy sayTexas should be lower than a 6 lol agreed.

For the Duke post y'all almost won the ACC last year if not for a few losses along the way.

OU still a 6 yes!!!!