08-08-2013, 03:49 PM
|
#19
|
Pro
OVR: 10
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: H-Town: Houma, LA (45 mi SW of NO)
|
Re: Being last in the nation in recruiting
|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by CR3AMnCR1MS0N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advice from one IU fan to another.
Start off in pre-season scouting by adding 15-20 guys to your board that you want.
Do the week 1 recruiting by adding the 500 pts to players you really want, and a couple hundred to other guys, or really, just whatever you want.
I decided to challenge myself and take over Louisiana-Lafayette, who by year four in my dynasty, are terrible. I currently have 15 guys on my board, and doing a good job of building up steam for this year's class.
Week 2, find the guys on your board that you have a good lead on (400 points or so and CPU teams losing points) and lower the number of points you give them by about 100 so you can give more points to players in battles. Also, cut players that you are losing by big margins to the CPU (around -1000 points); those points can be better used elsewhere. Finally, go to search and search whatever players you want (you choose caliber, position, speed etc.) and search for the ones who have a lock percentage of 25% or less. After the search, pull up more info on each recruit and add the ones (you want) who have no scholarship offers. Then scout them, offer them a scholarship, and give them points. You should be able to get a lot more guys this way.
Do the steps in the last paragraph each week from week 2 on, and hopefully you'll have most of your class signed by signing day so you can put lots of points into the guys you really want in the off-season. I reeled in the #1 class with Washington last year using this approach. Hopefully this helps you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forgot about that stuff. Along with what I said earlier, I do this, as well. Good points. I'm never out of the top ten in recruiting unless I have the depth that I don't need that many players.
|
|
|