BCS Predictions WAY Off

[atnhstywen]

If an SEC team doesn't win it, then it's unrealistic?

[XXstormmXX]

Quote: Originally Posted by atnhstywen

If an SEC team doesn't win it, then it's unrealistic?

No, but I would expect one of the better no-SEC teams like Ohio State or Michigan or Louisville or Stanford to win if not a SEC team.

[pujolsformvp21]

Quote: Originally Posted by XXstormmXX

Those are the kinds of weird BCS simulations I'm talking about.

this is why i always check after every season in the weaker conferences because quite often teams like you mentioned would be ranked in the top 10ish and then playing in those weaker conferences they can go undefeated and the bcs formula in the game gives them way more credit than they would in real life. so what i do is move them into the closest major conference and then it balances out because they will not go undefeated in a major conference. navy will consistently be ranked in top 10 unless you move them out of independents.

[stnsyhwen]

I noticed that in this game the BCS simulation in dynasty mode can be way off

[stnsyhwen]

I noticed that in this game the BCS simulation in dynasty mode can be way off

[bcduggan]

Bcs title game, in ncaa video game series, goes like this:


If team is undefeated they are number 1
If multiple teams are undefeated, the order follows the conference prestige, example if Bama, WKU, and Buffalo are undefeated. If Bama was in the #1 conference they would be in, if Buffalo has better conference prestige than wku, Buffalo would be in

This applies to one loss teams as well.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

[Aztec4Life]

I forgot who I was. But it was default rosters, not even named yet or downloaded from anywhere. It was the 2nd year of the dynasty and Louisiana tech does 14-0 and win the NC.