I want to start of by thanking Timeetyo and JoshC1977 for the inspiration for this relegation system. Also because this is sort of a combination of both of their systems.
JoshC1977's
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...ncaa-14-a.html
Timeetyo's
http://www.operationsports.com/forum...on-system.html
How it works
I have set this relegation system to be a 4 tier system with 4 regions. All of the Elite and Mid tier conferences have 2 divisions. Regions are geographically based.
See attached picture for the tier/region layout
Relegations
Low -> Mid: Best eligible team (1 team total)
Mid -> Low: Worst eligible team from the same region as the low promotion (1 team total)
Mid -> High: Conference champions or best available (2 teams total)
High -> Mid: Worst eligible teams from the same region as the mid promotions (2 teams total)
High -> Elite: Conference champions or best available (4 teams total)
Elite -> High: Worst eligible teams from the same region divisions as the high promotions (4 teams total)
Once a team gets promoted or demoted, that team is stuck in their new tier for 2 years. This will help prevent borderline teams from jumping back and forth between tier and help create stability.
It is important to keep teams in their same region & division or else conferences will start to lose their geographical ties. I have attached a spreadsheet showing what teams are in what tier, region and division (it will also help for tracking purposes so you will know if a team is eligible for relegation). If you notice, I've set the teams based on JoshC's regions except with 4 tiers instead of 3.
BCS Ties
BIG12 - ANY
PAC12 - ANY
BIG10 - ANY
SEC - ANY
AAC and MWC - Fiesta Bowl
MAC and ACC - Orange Bowl
Also, I am using a point system for the Independent schools rather than going based on overall record due to some teams schedules being harder than others. A team with a harder schedule with no FCS teams shouldn't be punished because a team with an easier schedule but played 2-3 FCS teams has a better record than them. This is just a personal preference and not needed for this system
5 pts- beating a top-ten opponent
4 pts- beating a top-25 team
3 pts- beating an unranked elite-tier
2 pts- beating an unranked high-tier
1 pt- beating any other team(not FCS)
To make it easier, I assign points based on the end of the year rankings.
Feel free to ask me any questions. I will answer the best I can.