More Links

Blinc924 · 06-13-2004, 01:19 AM

i know someone that is going to play for USC this coming year

soxboy7 · 06-13-2004, 01:27 AM

So do I, infact I know the whole roster. I just looked it up

jackson · 06-13-2004, 01:27 AM

incoming freshmen talent is a matter of opinion and a lot of factors influence how successful a player is in college. there is too much hype surrounding their number one recruiting class. do i really need to talk about the longhorns success and recruiting prowess the last several years. i suspect that an LSU or Georgia or possibly OK to take it this year. too many questions surrounding usc's class.

jackson · 06-13-2004, 01:30 AM

oh i forgot, look for rhett bomar and adrian peterson at OU to make a huge splash onto the college scene the next several years. peterson's numbers in hs are unbelieveable.

Blinc924 · 06-13-2004, 01:40 AM

haha, na his name is dwayne jarrett hes a wide receiver from NJ

Programmed2Kill · 06-13-2004, 02:48 AM

Quote:

jackson said:
incoming freshmen talent is a matter of opinion and a lot of factors influence how successful a player is in college. there is too much hype surrounding their number one recruiting class. do i really need to talk about the longhorns success and recruiting prowess the last several years. i suspect that an LSU or Georgia or possibly OK to take it this year. too many questions surrounding usc's class.

People still use Texas as their argument and I don't know why. The coaches aren't good at making their talent progress nor good enough to make them succeed to where they should be.

MattOrphan · 06-13-2004, 11:06 AM

Yup, there's no question that recruiting is important. Good athletes will make good players most of the time, and where have good athletes been more successful lately than USC? What are the questions surrounding them? Fred Davis, Keith Rivers and others will contribute quickly and more of the players from last years class will step in. USC is insanely loaded. They were a dominating team last year with practically nothing but freshman running the ball, those guys are just going to get a year better. And it's not like Texas sucks. It's no secret that the schools who annually get the best classes have the best teams.

Bad_Intentions · 06-13-2004, 11:45 AM

recruiting is important but a stellar recruiting class may not mean jack that year. You might have a couple standout freshmen, but the experienced players get most of the playing time and mostly decide the outcome of games. Which is why I think USC will probally be 1, OU and LSU are probally 2 and 3.

06-13-2004, 01:19 AM	#9
Blinc924 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: May 2003	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 i know someone that is going to play for USC this coming year

06-13-2004, 01:27 AM	#10
soxboy7 MVP OVR: 10 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Elgin, Illinois Posts: 1,541	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 So do I, infact I know the whole roster. I just looked it up

06-13-2004, 01:27 AM	#11
jackson Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: duncan, OK	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 incoming freshmen talent is a matter of opinion and a lot of factors influence how successful a player is in college. there is too much hype surrounding their number one recruiting class. do i really need to talk about the longhorns success and recruiting prowess the last several years. i suspect that an LSU or Georgia or possibly OK to take it this year. too many questions surrounding usc's class.

06-13-2004, 01:30 AM	#12
jackson Rookie OVR: 5 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: duncan, OK	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 oh i forgot, look for rhett bomar and adrian peterson at OU to make a huge splash onto the college scene the next several years. peterson's numbers in hs are unbelieveable.

06-13-2004, 01:40 AM	#13
Blinc924 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: May 2003	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 haha, na his name is dwayne jarrett hes a wide receiver from NJ

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

06-13-2004, 02:48 AM	#14
Programmed2Kill Banned OVR: 20 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: P.H.I.L.A. Posts: 14,644	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 Quote: *jackson said:* incoming freshmen talent is a matter of opinion and a lot of factors influence how successful a player is in college. there is too much hype surrounding their number one recruiting class. do i really need to talk about the longhorns success and recruiting prowess the last several years. i suspect that an LSU or Georgia or possibly OK to take it this year. too many questions surrounding usc's class. People still use Texas as their argument and I don't know why. The coaches aren't good at making their talent progress nor good enough to make them succeed to where they should be.

06-13-2004, 11:06 AM	#15
MattOrphan Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Feb 2003	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 Yup, there's no question that recruiting is important. Good athletes will make good players most of the time, and where have good athletes been more successful lately than USC? What are the questions surrounding them? Fred Davis, Keith Rivers and others will contribute quickly and more of the players from last years class will step in. USC is insanely loaded. They were a dominating team last year with practically nothing but freshman running the ball, those guys are just going to get a year better. And it's not like Texas sucks. It's no secret that the schools who annually get the best classes have the best teams.

06-13-2004, 11:45 AM	#16
Bad_Intentions All Star OVR: 17 Join Date: Oct 2002	Re: NCAA 2005\'s top 10 recruiting is important but a stellar recruiting class may not mean jack that year. You might have a couple standout freshmen, but the experienced players get most of the playing time and mostly decide the outcome of games. Which is why I think USC will probally be 1, OU and LSU are probally 2 and 3.

More Links

NCAA 2005's top 10