Info from NCAA Football 2005 Strategy Guide

[Flawless]

I feel sorry for DT, if these happen to be the ratings in the game, lots of editing needs to be done.

[hogd]

LA-Tech-79
qb-72
rb-83
wr-69
dl-86
ol-80
lb-82
db-77
st-78

[hogd]

memphis-79
qb-76
rb-89
wr-68
ol-74
dl-79
lb-86
db-77
st-64

[CM Hooe]

Quote:

---

hogd said:
UVA-90
qb-86
rb-93
wr-78
ol-87
dl-81
lb-80
db-95
st-82


Im thinking there is a typo in the book here.....I think LBs are supposed to be 95 and dbs are an 80

---

Thanks for posting 'em. Yeah, I would like to think that is a typo too; UVA's linebacking corps should be one of the best in the nation this year, while the secondary could be a little iffy.

[Brandwin]

Could someone please post Baylors ratings.

[fsquid]

Quote:

---

hogd said:
memphis-79
qb-76
rb-89
wr-68
ol-74
dl-79
lb-86
db-77
st-64

---

Either fake or EA doesn't have a good ratings system. We lost all our LBs from last year, but that is our strongest point.

[xboxfever]

Could you give me Iowa State please?

[Hollayo]

This is complete crap, you guys should stop asking for ratings. They aren't accurate.