Info from NCAA Football 2005 Strategy Guide

[nstod]

How about Utah?

[Motown]

Quote:

---

nstod said:
How about Utah?

---

The Utes

all - 77
qb - 74
rb - 78
wr - 77
ol - 81
dl - 77
lb - 64
db - 84
st teams - 79

Key Off player WR #82 spd 90 awar 85 acc 92 catch 86
Key Def player FS #25 spd 92 awar 90 catch 72 tackl 70
Key underclassman CB #32 spd 89 awar 76 acc 90 catch

[nstod]

Yeah, this can't be right. Utah is ranked #25 in this game, yet they have a lower overall rating than the other 2 MWC teams listed (BYU and UNM). I guess we'll see when the game comes out...

[Brandwin]

Quote:

---

Hollayo said:
This is complete crap, you guys should stop asking for ratings. They aren't accurate.

---

Yeah, great post. Except for the fact you have no proof one way or another.

On that note, Baylors ratings please

BTW who knows if these ratings are legit or not, doesnt hurt to talk about whats posted though.

[Flawless]

I dont know what forumla they are coming up with to get the "All Unit" rating. Obvisouly you would think they are averaging everyone in that unit, so that would mean their would have to be players well over the average to make up for the low end of the unit. I mean Arizona a door mat of the Pac 10 is 86 overall. I don't see the logic behind that.

[dirtypeter]

How about some Oklahoma State rankings plz!!!

Go Pokes!

[BlockM]

Wow, a 93 for a OSU at QB? Well I thought they would be rated higher then us at RB so I guess it's even....nah!

Can I get any ratings for Washington State or Tulsa?

[joer625]

VTech if u can