Loan Length Question

[BigRed07]

I have a handful of younger players that won't be seeing any playing time soon. I am curious, what have you guys seen as far as what type of loan length is more likely to get accepted? It seems when I put one year or two year I rarely get any takers, but short loans are more often taken. Is it possible to ask for a two year or one year and get an offer for a short loan?

[Tekkonkinkreet]

No they won't offer a different loan length to what you have listed.

I have found that most of the players I list for one year loans have offers. I have rarely tried short loans or two year. Mainly because I don't trust the development of that player whilst with another team.

I would stick with one year loans, the majority of players you put up should get a move.

[Tekkonkinkreet]

Should have said the development during a two year loan.

[NewbWoody]

I was wondering too if getting younger players like 16-18 should I loan them out instead of letting them just sit on the team or is it better to keep them with the club and just train them up.

[Tekkonkinkreet]

If you think they have a legitimate future then train them up for two years then loan them out for a year or two.

[JayD]

I honestly don't think loaning out players develop them faster than just leaving them on the reserve squad.

[Altimus]

The system should just be set for - player available as loan - and then the AI offers loan length and user is able to negotiate.

[NewbWoody]

ok thanks yeah I was thinking about doing that getting young guys training them a bit then loaning them out for a year or two. Thanks for the help