Judge this Scorecard

[TheRizzzle]

I feel like I've gotten too many results like this. I was Jotko. I get it. I didnt do a lot of damage. But really? Neither did Holland. Maybe it could have been 29-28 (his one rock was literally the first strike of the fight).

What do you think?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

[johnmangala]

I think you should've won that based on volume and control.

But damage wise, it seems the other person landed more sig strikes. I notice that wins more rounds.

[ryangil23]

Guessing most of your strikes were rabbit punches which do next to zero damage. Posture up a couple of times or get a few elbows in side control or something and you’d have won easily.

[NEWSS]

29-28 Jotko

Sent from my SM-A505FN using Operation Sports mobile app

[TheRizzzle]

Quote: Originally Posted by ryangil23

Guessing most of your strikes were rabbit punches which do next to zero damage. Posture up a couple of times or get a few elbows in side control or something and you’d have won easily.

It's the only explanation based on the game mechanics and you are correct they were rabbit punches.

But I'd argue the sheer amount of rabbit punches are more in accumulative damage than those significant strike totals round over round.

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

[ryangil23]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheRizzzle

It's the only explanation based on the game mechanics and you are correct they were rabbit punches. But I'd argue the sheer amount of rabbit punches are more in accumulative damage than those significant strike totals round over round. Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

You could try in practice mode and see how much damage they do. I’m not sure exactly how much but I’d bet a couple of 1-2s could easily do more damage than 4 minutes of rabbit punches. They’re really meant to build grapple advantage rather than do any damage.

[TheRizzzle]

Quote: Originally Posted by ryangil23

You could try in practice mode and see how much damage they do. I’m not sure exactly how much but I’d bet a couple of 1-2s could easily do more damage than 4 minutes of rabbit punches. They’re really meant to build grapple advantage rather than do any damage.

Again in terms of the game mechanics and what's under the hood...you're probably right.

IRL, those subconcussive blows are the ones the doctors say have the most effect on long term CTE. So what's more damaging? 4 minutes of 10% shots or 2-3 35%ers?

Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

[ryangil23]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheRizzzle

Again in terms of the game mechanics and what's under the hood...you're probably right. IRL, those subconcussive blows are the ones the doctors say have the most effect on long term CTE. So what's more damaging? 4 minutes of 10% shots or 2-3 35%ers? Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

Yeah in the game they pretty much do nothing but they can add up in real life. Would be cool if they done a little damage or took a bit of stamina if you keep hitting the body. The same for strikes off the back as well.