The UT "Equalizer" - Yes I believe it exists, I will explain...

[whatlez]

I disagree. With my 91 overall MW, I whoop pretty much all players lower than me. I can tell if they have a weak chin or low toughness cause one combo they are down or a few punches on top and they're knocked out. The only problems I usually get are the same few guys who are all maxed in athleticism.

I feel bad beating lower fighters in 2 minutes but I want to win haha. The only person who I struggle against who has a significantly lower rates fighter is Kenetic RNG and that's probably cause he's one of the best players on the game.

[chia]

Quote: Originally Posted by GUCCI

Never have this problem. Transition denial works fine. Imo its even too easy to hold a guy like gsp on the ground if anything they need to make the deny windows smaller or just leave it like its now

This is referring to UT hence the UT forum. Not ranked where the Overalls are closer together.

[chia]

Quote: Originally Posted by whatlez

I disagree. With my 91 overall MW, I whoop pretty much all players lower than me. I can tell if they have a weak chin or low toughness cause one combo they are down or a few punches on top and they're knocked out. The only problems I usually get are the same few guys who are all maxed in athleticism. I feel bad beating lower fighters in 2 minutes but I want to win haha. The only person who I struggle against who has a significantly lower rates fighter is Kenetic RNG and that's probably cause he's one of the best players on the game.

Do you constantly use cookie cutter Hit Stun combos and check the attributes of every fighter you face?

[whatlez]

Quote: Originally Posted by chia

Do you constantly use cookie cutter Hit Stun combos and check the attributes of every fighter you face?

No I don't do the two punches, one leg kick, one head kick combo. I do my own that I don't see used much. I do a lot of crucifix recently though haha.

I do check the fighters sometimes depending how difficult they were. But these days I don't fight that many new fighters. Same 10-15 really.

[fishingtime]

Quote: Originally Posted by chia

Bumping this because I flat out don't believe the EA Dev that posted on here. It's just complete rubbish. Unless it's just coincidence that my toughest fights are against people 15-20 point OVERALL less than me. Funny how my closest fights are with fighters within 5 overall levels but yeah just must be in my head.

Why would he say something that isn't true? They have to be careful about what they say already. The matchmaking in Ultimate Team has no relevance since there really is none because you can delete a fighter and start over in Division 1. A really good player can take a 65 OVR fighter and do pretty good against lower skilled players. I couldn't, but know many who can.

[chia]

Quote: Originally Posted by fishingtime

Why would he say something that isn't true? They have to be careful about what they say already. The matchmaking in Ultimate Team has no relevance since there really is none because you can delete a fighter and start over in Division 1. A really good player can take a 65 OVR fighter and do pretty good against lower skilled players. I couldn't, but know many who can.

Hrmmm... not sure if serious. Not a bash at the guy but if my company was doing something sketchy (not illegal in the least) and I knew about it but knew I wasn't supposed to talk about it I would lie too. Makes sense.

[frankenjoebeans]

Quote: Originally Posted by whatlez

No I don't do the two punches, one leg kick, one head kick combo. I do my own that I don't see used much. I do a lot of crucifix recently though haha. I do check the fighters sometimes depending how difficult they were. But these days I don't fight that many new fighters. Same 10-15 really.

Played a bit yesterday. Every freaking cheeser in the game is now spamming the crucifix combo thing. It never ends with these people... Luckily most suck at it.

[fishingtime]

Quote: Originally Posted by chia

Hrmmm... not sure if serious. Not a bash at the guy but if my company was doing something sketchy (not illegal in the least) and I knew about it but knew I wasn't supposed to talk about it I would lie too. Makes sense.

If that was the case, he wouldn't have even responded. You see the failed logic?