EA UFC 3 is worth getting into, but it's not worth the minimum asking price of 70$

[moozoog]

How is it not worth it? They've overhauled the entire game since UFC 1 and added a bunch of content. If you're an MMA fan it's woth it, IMO.

[TheGentlemanGhost]

I'm getting it. They've been making a lot of great decisions post beta and I enjoyed the new striking system as well as the potential of more changes after release. I'm also excited about the career mode. I knew much else wasn't getting touched but I liked the new stand up and vulnerability as well as the adjustments made so after after the beta, so...why not...

[godway]

You're trying to be too Reddit-ish with this thread. Instead of using Battlefront II, I'll use For Honor as an example. For Honor, which by all means is a pretty fun game, was boycotted shortly after launch because it was f'ing unplayable. Connection issues were horrendous, the grind was impossible, it was a greedy pay2win insult to the people who were actually looking forward to the game. It deserved boycotted. To this day it still hasn't shaken that reputation, either.

There's nothing like that with UFC 3. It's actually kind of the opposite. The number 1 issue that needed fixed from UFC 2 to UFC 3 was the standup game and they devoted probably more resources than they should have into fixing that. They tried very hard with this game. They might have disappointed in a number of other areas, but it's a far cry from needing to "make a stand" against them. If they ignored the awful CAF because they were going to release a "CAF pack" that you had to pay for, then I would say yeah, boycott these pieces of s***. But they ignore it because I'm assuming it's a time/resources thing. And that just is what it is.

I'm disappointed in a lot of what I seen for this game. But there's enough there to get your money's worth. And they aren't doing anything with microtransactions or grinding that is as insultingly criminal as other games have done in the past year. They don't deserve boycotted. Save that for game's that actually deserve the blowback.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by godway

You're trying to be too Reddit-ish with this thread. Instead of using Battlefront II, I'll use For Honor as an example. For Honor, which by all means is a pretty fun game, was boycotted shortly after launch because it was f'ing unplayable. Connection issues were horrendous, the grind was impossible, it was a greedy pay2win insult to the people who were actually looking forward to the game. It deserved boycotted. To this day it still hasn't shaken that reputation, either. There's nothing like that with UFC 3. It's actually kind of the opposite. The number 1 issue that needed fixed from UFC 2 to UFC 3 was the standup game and they devoted probably more resources than they should have into fixing that. They tried very hard with this game. They might have disappointed in a number of other areas, but it's a far cry from needing to "make a stand" against them. If they ignored the awful CAF because they were going to release a "CAF pack" that you had to pay for, then I would say yeah, boycott these pieces of s***. But they ignore it because I'm assuming it's a time/resources thing. And that just is what it is. I'm disappointed in a lot of what I seen for this game. But there's enough there to get your money's worth. And they aren't doing anything with microtransactions or grinding that is as insultingly criminal as other games have done in the past year. They don't deserve boycotted. Save that for game's that actually deserve the blowback.

Great reasonable post from someone who is disappointed with the game.

[Dcooks]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

I havent addressed you since last week. Honestly, I didnt know who the hell you were until then. You dont stand out to me at all as a poster. Thats not "shade" (men are saying "shade", now?). Thats not even meant as an insult. Its just that there are plenty of posters here who I dont know or care about. Just like there are plenty of people who dont know or care about me here. The Aldo post wasnt meant for you. It wasnt. Aldo was the first name that came to mind that people (including you) mentioned that needed to be upgraded. I was using Dustin Poirier as an example of that the week before hand. When I address a person, I address them directly but I dont know need to throw insults. That **** is easy and will get me banned from a place that I enjoy being. Talking tough on the internet isnt impressive to me so call me what you want but it honestly doesnt matter to me. I'm going to continue to post how I post. If you cant handle that, that sucks. If the only way you can respond is to throw insults like some keyboard warrior, you likely wont be here that long. Now if you want to debate a point Ive made, feel free.

Trust im no keyboard warrior. Far from it. The fact that you feel I'm trying to talk tough shows the kind of person you're... My whole point in addressing you was about the stance you take on this forum in regards to those that disagree with you. I don't like the way you address those that disagree with you. That's all. I didn't know people could so threatened on a video game forum. Lmaoo. But go figure.

Anyway, no point in continuing to address you. You see nothing wrong with how you are, you will remain the same.

[RetractedMonkey]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dcooks

Trust im no keyboard warrior. Far from it.

That's definitely something a keyboard warrior would say. "Trust me, bro! I'm no nerd!"

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by RetractedMonkey

That's definitely something a keyboard warrior would say. "Trust me, bro! I'm no nerd!"

Exactly. I dont feel the need to do "tough talk" online. That **** is weak. People get real confident on OS from behind their keyboards.

If it was all about my "stance" he wouldnt feel the need to try to insult me. He would just address it and we would agree to disagree but it is what is.

[kman192]

Quote: Originally Posted by manliest_Man

Where can i do that? Last time i checked, was 80-90 Euros through EA UFC 2 10% discount at reveal trailer. Now i think it's 70 Euros for standard or 80-90 Euros for Champions. I would have loved to have a game where i would spend 70-80-90 Euros if i knew the game was worth it, but EA UFC 3 ain't one of them, despite me being a hardcore fan of the series and knowing i'll be spending a lot of time most likely with it. But at times, i remember being burned out with EA UFC 2, due to a lot of it's issues and i remember there being like an 8 month period, where i couldn't wait to hear something about EA UFC 3 and i had stopped playing EA UFC 2 for like 4 months and only returned back to it recently until EA UFC 3 beta came out.

Are you on xbox or ps4. Because on xbox I just pre ordered the champion edition for 79.99 canadian dollars not sure what that would be in euros. But on xbox go in to ufc 2 there is a discount on the champion edition for 10% off and if you have eaccess it 20% off.