Home

Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

This is a discussion on Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage within the EA Sports UFC forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > EA Sports UFC
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-11-2018, 05:46 PM   #1
Banned
 
Faiered's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2018
Question Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage/do less damage

Why non blocked strikes deal soo much less damage? many fights in real life end from non blocked strikes.Against the IA this can be really seen as he can take 20 strikes without blocking but if he strikes and you counter he is dead

Last edited by Faiered; 02-11-2018 at 05:57 PM.
Faiered is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 02-11-2018, 06:53 PM   #2
EA Game Changer
 
Solid_Altair's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2016
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Vulnerability would lose most of its meaning if being iddle were enough to concede.

The only case in which it's condeded for being iddle is for the body, the open side and the liver side (which may stack on the same side). And it's justa bit.
Solid_Altair is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2018, 06:58 PM   #3
Banned
 
Faiered's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2018
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solid_Altair
Vulnerability would lose most of its meaning if being iddle were enough to concede.

The only case in which it's condeded for being iddle is for the body, the open side and the liver side (which may stack on the same side). And it's justa bit.
But you find it realistic that non blocked strikes do soo little damage compared to the counters
Faiered is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2018, 06:58 PM   #4
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2012
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solid_Altair
Vulnerability would lose most of its meaning if being iddle were enough to concede.

The only case in which it's condeded for being iddle is for the body, the open side and the liver side (which may stack on the same side). And it's justa bit.
Why do you think that?

You’re essentially always vulnerable unless actively defending. That’s why one of the rules is “defend yourself at all times”
Phillyboi207 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2018, 07:00 PM   #5
Banned
 
Faiered's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2018
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillyboi207
Why do you think that?

You’re essentially always vulnerable unless actively defending. That’s why one of the rules is “defend yourself at all times”
Keep allways your arms up right? a strike on the chin remains a strike on the chin even if its not a counter and needs to do more damage
Faiered is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 02-11-2018, 07:13 PM   #6
MVP
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Nov 2017
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Quote:
Originally Posted by Faiered
Keep allways your arms up right? a strike on the chin remains a strike on the chin even if its not a counter and needs to do more damage
A kick to the head is still a kick to the head, i dont understand how people cant understand this, Id like to see a difference between glancing blows and full contact without vulnerability. Like a difference between shin to chin and toe to chin.
FCB x Finlay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2018, 07:18 PM   #7
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2012
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Quote:
Originally Posted by FCB x Finlay
A kick to the head is still a kick to the head, i dont understand how people cant understand this, Id like to see a difference between glancing blows and full contact without vulnerability. Like a difference between shin to chin and toe to chin.
Yeah if you’re moving away from a strike you should have way less vulnerability but if you’re just sitting you should take serious damage.
Phillyboi207 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2018, 07:19 PM   #8
Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
 
GameplayDevUFC's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,840
Re: Non blocked strikes have no vulnerability damage

Vulnerability is mostly about the extra damage done due to the movement of the body part (with the exception of the liver vulnerability).

If you are idle, nothing is moving, so there *extra* vulnerability.

If we added vulnerability when idling, that would just be the new baseline, and you would have extra vulnerability when moving.

Which is exactly how it works now.
GameplayDevUFC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > EA Sports UFC »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.
Top -