For the love of God...

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by tekara83

if u can tell simply from just the stats then why do u need the fight video?? I really don't think ppl are gonna watch a 15 min video.. I'm asking what I did wrong... I controlled the center most of the fight, No head/body rocks on me, he had 4 failed takedown attempts. If stats don't determine a fight. then what does, that's what I'm trying to figure out. the first video, I guess couldn't went either way....the second video is what confuses me.

People have tried to break this down for you but I'll do it again.

Damage/Impact (strikes that bring you closer to ending a fight) is what determines a fight.

If you outland me by 20 sig strikes in round 1 but I rock you twice, I will likely win the round because I caused more damage and came closer to ending the fight.

Same goes if you outland me by 20 sig strikes and I knock you down once.

Same goes if I rock you twice but you spend the rest of the round in top control landing small strikes.

Thats why I need to see the fight because stats dont tell me how many times you were rocked or how much damage you took in a particular round.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by a4einboy

i believe you 100% ive been playing mma games for a while and the broken dec started in ufc 2 and moved to ufc 3 . people say they have to see the fight but i know exactly what your talking about just move on man you will get no answers here because in this forum everything about the game is perfect (sarcasm)

See this is an absolutely useless post that is based on no facts.

UFC 2's judging logic was flawed. The devs admitted that. The community saw that. The judging is completely different in UFC 3. Its based on a completley different criteria than UFC 3.

I know people love to post nonsense here but you should actually know what you are talking about before you post.

[aholbert32]

One other thing:

You lost a split decision. Now the game doesnt have draws so it couldve been a draw and you lost because of the game randomized who won.

With that said, I cant tell without looking at the video.

[tekara83]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

People have tried to break this down for you but I'll do it again. Damage/Impact (strikes that bring you closer to ending a fight) is what determines a fight. If you outland me by 20 sig strikes in round 1 but I rock you twice, I will likely win the round because I caused more damage and came closer to ending the fight. Same goes if you outland me by 20 sig strikes and I knock you down once. Same goes if I rock you twice but you spend the rest of the round in top control landing small strikes. Thats why I need to see the fight because stats dont tell me how many times you were rocked or how much damage you took in a particular round.

with that logic then maybe the first fight against Belfort could of went either way.. The Fight against Browne, just doesn't add up to what u are saying for him to get the win, It was a very boring fight, I rocked him once and got a knockdown...I never got rocked.... Ill will have to post the fight when I get home then I guess.

[a4einboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

See this is an absolutely useless post that is based on no facts. UFC 2's judging logic was flawed. The devs admitted that. The community saw that. The judging is completely different in UFC 3. Its based on a completley different criteria than UFC 3. I know people love to post nonsense here but you should actually know what you are talking about before you post.

well i made a thread back when we played ufc 2 and said the dec were broken but everyone said there fine , i made a thread during the beta for ufc 3 and said the double leg takedowns were broken what happend ...the game came out and it got patched after other people realized it .. no disrespect but these devs need people to tell them whats wrong with the game instead of agreeing with everything they put out. why not just take a look at things other people post about we want the game to get better but it wont if every time the devs feel to change something we have to agree . ive seen a 3 round fight were one person...never mind were always going to be wrong so ill just sit back and watch the numbers and then well see whos right and wrong

[tekara83]

[quote=aholbert32;2049263466]One other thing:

You lost a split decision. Now the game doesnt have draws so it couldve been a draw and you lost because of the game randomized who won.

With that said, I cant tell without looking at the video.[/QUO


was there a reason why there isn't draws in this game, but are draws in UFC even if rare? Instead of a heads/tails system of determining a winner when its to close to call.

[aholbert32]

Quote: Originally Posted by tekara83

with that logic then maybe the first fight against Belfort could of went either way.. The Fight against Browne, just doesn't add up to what u are saying for him to get the win, It was a very boring fight, I rocked him once and got a knockdown...I never got rocked.... Ill will have to post the fight when I get home then I guess.

Post the fight. If I'm wrong I will say so but everytime someone has posted a fight its usually been right according to the criteria. The one exception was before the patch sub attempts were rated too high in the criteria and people were winning just because they were spamming subs.

[aholbert32]

[quote=tekara83;2049263518]

Quote: Originally Posted by aholbert32

One other thing: You lost a split decision. Now the game doesnt have draws so it couldve been a draw and you lost because of the game randomized who won. With that said, I cant tell without looking at the video.[/QUO was there a reason why there isn't draws in this game, but are draws in UFC even if rare? Instead of a heads/tails system of determining a winner when its to close to call.

draws are rare and the team hasnt gotten around to mo capping fighter animations for a draw. Its on the dev's list but its low priority.