Home

Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

This is a discussion on Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina within the EA Sports UFC forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > EA Sports UFC
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-15-2018, 08:33 PM   #41
(aka Alberto)
 
aholbert32's Arena
 
OVR: 44
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 33,173
Blog Entries: 8
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

Quote:
Originally Posted by FCB x Finlay
Why cant we make movement free instead of tied to your oppentent
I cant remember the exact reason but GPD explained it to the GCs a while ago. Martial had the same question but I cant recall the answer. I do remember that it made sense at the time.
aholbert32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-15-2018, 08:36 PM   #42
MVP
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Nov 2017
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

Quote:
Originally Posted by aholbert32
I cant remember the exact reason but GPD explained it to the GCs a while ago. Martial had the same question but I cant recall the answer. I do remember that it made sense at the time.
Possibly people wouldn't be able to engage, like they wouldn't be able to follow there opponent and fight effectively? It could be an option at least.

Maybe for advanced moments only it could be an option.
FCB x Finlay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 08:49 PM   #43
MVP
 
Boiler569's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Northern VA
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

Strikes Def. need to take more stamina, especially blocked.

That said, block breakdown should be quicker and/or block regen take longer (I think a combo of both, not a HUGE change to either but if both were changed a bit, would make a big difference

Did a poll earlier this week and 75%+ of community agrees!
__________________
PSN: Boiler569
Have Fun, It's Just A GAME!
Top 10 (Fight Night Series) R.I.P. Joe Frazier
FNR4 Gamestop Vegas Tournament Qualifier
Ranked #1 (EA MMA)

UFC 3 LEC: 2x Diamond; 6x Plat.
@Boiler569 on Twitter & Twitch
Boiler569 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 08:50 PM   #44
MVP
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2016
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boiler569
Strikes Def. need to take more stamina, especially blocked.

That said, block breakdown should be quicker and/or block regen take longer (I think a combo of both, not a HUGE change to either but if both were changed a bit, would make a big difference

Did a poll earlier this week and 75%+ of community agrees!
I 100% agreed. need more stamina tax on blocked.
tissues250 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 08:52 PM   #45
MVP
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Nov 2017
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

Short term or long term stamina? for the 2 above
FCB x Finlay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 03-18-2018, 08:41 AM   #46
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2012
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

So just to be clear

People are cool with 137 head kicks only taking 30% stam?

I’d be cool with 40% which would be a 33% increase towards long term drain(leave short term alone)

Backward footwork is too slow for high footwork guys.

Lunges in general and way worse than last year
Phillyboi207 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2018, 09:23 AM   #47
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2018
Re: Proof that blocked strikes dont cost enough stamina

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillyboi207
So just to be clear

People are cool with 137 head kicks only taking 30% stam?

I’d be cool with 40% which would be a 33% increase towards long term drain(leave short term alone)

Backward footwork is too slow for high footwork guys.

Lunges in general and way worse than last year
I'm not cool with that! Honestly I was was surprised of the lack of overall participation in some of boilers polls. Do people just not care or is this site full of lurkers?. I see how many views these posts get so you would think you would get a couple hundred survey responses at least.

I'd be curious to see the larticicpation rate in a poll on the official ea UFC forums and reddit.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Operation Sports mobile app
dina1229 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > EA Sports UFC »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 AM.
Top -