Defending takedown into double under

[rabbitfistssaipailo]

I agree takedowns are easy to deny ...it pains me to see my takedown attempt denied after I slip or block a head kick .

Sent from my Infinix Zero 4 using Tapatalk

[Dave_S]

Quote: Originally Posted by Bigg Cee

I have no idea. It’s just broken because you can deny everything. Even when the game came out and the double leg was like a rocket, you could still deny easy with the double under. Sometimes you see your stamina drain all the way down when someone denies you. It’s weird. I’ve only played a few people who know this and it’s all they use in ranked fights. So far the community hasn’t figured this out yet. Anyways, after they removed the GA from ducking you don’t even need to do it anymore since takedowns are so easy to deny now.

I don't like double under, it seems like such a pointless position in real life unless you are on the cage fighting for control.

[rabbitfistssaipailo]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dave_S

I don't like double under, it seems like such a pointless position in real life unless you are on the cage fighting for control.

Single leg from double under if you can get it puts you in side control if I'm not mistaken ...but then again with the momentum your bottom fighter could escape tho ...

Sent from my Infinix Zero 4 using Tapatalk

[Dave_S]

Quote: Originally Posted by rabbitfistssaipailo

Single leg from double under if you can get it puts you in side control if I'm not mistaken ...but then again with the momentum your bottom fighter could escape tho ... Sent from my Infinix Zero 4 using Tapatalk

I'm just saying in real life I don't see takedowns denied to double underhooks and double underhooks in the center of the cage very much. In UFC 3 we see double underhooks too often in the center of the octagon.

[johnmangala]

What is the input command for the DU-TD reversal again?

[MacGowan]

IRL double underhooks are awesome.

I don't understand what the insentive is for denying a takedown to him getting double underhooks.
That should be up to the attacker, not the defender.

[Dave_S]

Quote: Originally Posted by MacGowan

IRL double underhooks are awesome. I don't understand what the insentive is for denying a takedown to him getting double underhooks. That should be up to the attacker, not the defender.

In the middle of the cage? Mostly I only hear Mr. Underhooks (Cruz) talk about it when they are on the fence.

[MacGowan]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dave_S

In the middle of the cage? Mostly I only hear Mr. Underhooks (Cruz) talk about it when they are on the fence.

Well clinches seem to almost always end up at the cage anyways.