Home

Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

This is a discussion on Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots. within the EA Sports UFC forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > EA Sports UFC
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2018, 03:38 PM   #65
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2012
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GameplayDevUFC
It would make body shots in the last round kind of pointless though.
I thought they take away more stamina / do more damage the lower your overall stamina is?

So in theory body shots will hurt more/ take away more stamina the longer the fight goes.
Phillyboi207 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 05-09-2018, 03:40 PM   #66
Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
 
GameplayDevUFC's Arena
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 2,840
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phillyboi207
I thought they take away more stamina / do more damage the lower your overall stamina is?

So in theory body shots will hurt more/ take away more stamina the longer the fight goes.
They do, but the idea of them taking more endurance than long term stamina would nerf them considerably in the last round.

If your opponent got tired and you were waiting for the last round to punish the body and take advantage of that, you would get less benefit than you do now.

And I don't know that the improvement from the change would really be worth that. All you'd really be doing is delaying the stamina impact of body strikes by 1 round, as opposed to getting a slight immediate benefit that piled up over time.
GameplayDevUFC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 03:47 PM   #67
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2012
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GameplayDevUFC
They do, but the idea of them taking more endurance than long term stamina would nerf them considerably in the last round.

If your opponent got tired and you were waiting for the last round to punish the body and take advantage of that, you would get less benefit than you do now.

And I don't know that the improvement from the change would really be worth that. All you'd really be doing is delaying the stamina impact of body strikes by 1 round, as opposed to getting a slight immediate benefit that piled up over time.
More than fair assessment

But honestly I think that’s kind of the idea. Body strikes usually dont have an immediate impact which is why most fighters dont bother risking it in the fight.

Like Cormier vs Jones both times were good examples. Cormier always has great stamina But Jon wore him down with body strikes and it started showing from the 3rd round on.

Either way I appreciate the feedback
Phillyboi207 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 03:47 PM   #68
Pro
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Aug 2016
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GameplayDevUFC
It would make body shots in the last round kind of pointless though.
Body shots when your permanent stamina is very low should do TONS of damage. Especially coming from a guy with good stamina. That is the absolute worst time to be hit by body strikes

Sent from my LGLS991 using Operation Sports mobile app
zeric is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 03:49 PM   #69
MVP
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Jan 2018
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

OwO is a classic example of how bad this can be abused. All the guy does is pick Eddie Alvarez and stay in your face throwing 1-2s to the body with the occasional body hook, and then he uses head movement to dodge any attacks.

I still beat him regardless but it's never a fun fight
UFCBlackbelt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 06:56 PM   #70
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2018
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Just fought someone who was Nate Diaz and he threw 184 strikes in two rounds and besides probably 20 those strikes were all jabs and straights and he barely lost any stamina.I just want a reason from someone as why those two strikes barely get any stamina taken away long term wise
CareBear59 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2018, 07:55 PM   #71
Banned
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: May 2018
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CareBear59
Just fought someone who was Nate Diaz and he threw 184 strikes in two rounds and besides probably 20 those strikes were all jabs and straights and he barely lost any stamina.I just want a reason from someone as why those two strikes barely get any stamina taken away long term wise
How about 184 strikes in 1 round?


z_Guardkneeba_r is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 05-09-2018, 08:01 PM   #72
MVP
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Apr 2016
Re: Strike output should be the #1 factor in stamina, not body shots.

Quote:
Originally Posted by z_Guardkneeba_r
How about 184 strikes in 1 round?


Damn.

Cheers ; p

Haz came back and got banned in an instant.

Is his original account permabanned? I thought Serenegeti would be back by now too. I'm guessing they both got permabanned?

Last edited by johnmangala; 05-09-2018 at 08:04 PM.
johnmangala is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Combat Sports > EA Sports UFC »



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 PM.
Top -