|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by TheGentlemanGhost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's a lot wrong with clinch, but striking wise MT clinch strikes simply don't need to be one and done. Whatever adjustments they make to clinch & mt clinch in the future, the power AND speed of clinch strikes need adjusting too. Power in MT knees and elbows should be lessened or more so have there own varied vulnerability and the speed needs to be faster.
I rarely look at ratings but are there even clinch striking ratings?
Sent from my SM-J700P using Operation Sports mobile app
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spot on about this.
There's a noticeable difference between ending up on the ground against a Maia and a Lawler.
There's a noticeable difference between standing against Mcgregor and an Ortega.
The only difference when it comes to the clinch, that I can think of, is clinch control. It being harder to transition in the clinch (without being denied) vs a Cormier compared to a Stipe.
But MT clinch Experts... maybe slightly more damage? Which itself isn't particularly noticeable because an elbow from a McGregor in MT clinch, will likely still result in the same outcome - a rock.
Sent from my HTC Desire 530 using
Operation Sports mobile app