Home
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-27-2003, 06:04 PM   #17
Rookie
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Mar 2003
Re: EGM Review Article

I remember back in the older EGM ie. couple months ago when they had more than a freakin paragraph review. WTF is up with 5 sentances and only mentioning 2 reasons why they hate it? They didn't even say shiznit about it going online.
DJJBulls is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 06:20 PM   #18
Pro
 
laxman490's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Re: EGM Review Article

"awesoome eight player at once online play"
laxman490 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 06:35 PM   #19
MVP
 
OVR: 8
Join Date: Aug 2002
Re: EGM Review Article

Quote:

laxman490 said:
"awesoome eight player at once online play"




That's in 2k3 too--it's not really a new feature.

Taylor34
taylor34 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 06:43 PM   #20
Pro
 
laxman490's Arena
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Re: EGM Review Article

Quote:

taylor34 said:
Quote:

laxman490 said:
"awesoome eight player at once online play"




That's in 2k3 too--it's not really a new feature.

Taylor34




i haven't played 2k3 online because i just got a network adapter. btw i knew 2k3 was online, but not 8 players at once. i'm confused now cause i think i would have heard if it was 8 players at once. oh well.
laxman490 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 06:46 PM   #21
All Star
 
Holic's Arena
 
OVR: 31
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Athens, Georgia
Posts: 6,429
Re: EGM Review Article

4 players per console I believe.
Holic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 07-27-2003, 09:38 PM   #22
Rookie
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Aug 2002
That was crap

What the hell was that.

That had to be the worst review that I have ever seen in my life time.

I mean come on, a one page review and most of that was taken up by pics. A review that has little or no detail on the game it's self.

I know that this was thier option but at least make it an in depth one.

They need to be
BigRol is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 10:13 PM   #23
F**tb*ll F*n*t*c
 
Fetter21's Arena
 
OVR: 30
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,404
Blog Entries: 10
Re: That was crap

Sounds like this reviewer is horrible and doesn't know what he's talking about, but it's his opinion and everyone is entitled to it. But if he thinks that Madden's run blocking is superior then he's lost all credibilty with me. I don't think the guy spent enough time with the game and that he was unfamilar with 2k3 which meant he probably didn't get use to the gameplay. To actually enjoy it.
Fetter21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2003, 11:18 PM   #24
Rookie
 
OVR: 2
Join Date: Mar 2003
Re: That was crap

The main reason why I think he gave the score he did is because he is a Madden fan and is going from Madden gameplay to ESPN gameplay which are very different. From my experience you can't go from Madden to 2k3 and expect to like it right away. He even explains that its hard to get used to the running if you are used to Madden. So all you ESPN fans I would take this article with a grain of salt.
willpeterson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > NFL 2K > ESPN NFL 2K5 Football »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Top -