07-28-2003, 01:52 PM
|
#16
|
Pro
|
Re: Why have gamers let.......
Quote:
ChicagoSparty said:
Quote:
njskillz said:
Quote:
ChicagoSparty said:
So, let's say a game came out, and the gameplay was excellent, but it had no season mode, let alone franchise mode. You could just play one team against another.
I think that would get real old, real quick, no matter how great the gameplay was.
The games are modeled after NFL football. Part of the NFL is being able to build a team, and keep a team together. The games try and represent that as well as having good play on the field.
I'm very content with the mix of on-the-field, as well as off-the-field features. It's true that I favor on-the-field gameplay most, but as long as it's good, and fairly realistic, I am happy.
In the online age, with leagues sprouting up left and right, if a game offered realistic graphics and gameplay, up to date rosters and player ratings, your damn right I would buy that game. I did already. It was called NFL2K3 (ok, the player ratings weren't the greatest, but I stand by everything else! LOL!) I have never and will never even click on Franchise, Crib, etc. I'm not knocking those who do but just can't see how that stuff would make or break whether someone would buy a FOOTBALL sim.
It does for me. I, for one, have no time to be keeping up with an online league. I'd be the one that would never play the games on time, etc. It's strictly sole-player for me.
Well that is a shame. The true beauty of NFL2K3 is it's multi-player gaming experience. I can understand the time issue though. I'm sure if I sat down and figured out what I could and SHOULD be doing as opposed to playing a videogame, I would probably be in agreement with you.
|
|
|