More Links

Bondra12 · 07-13-2004, 03:37 PM

Quote:

ronnyballgame said:
If you dont like the ratings, cant you just change them before you start a franchise or whatever to make yourself feel better, I dunno, no one answered my question, where did you find these ratings at!

There are screenshots on the NFL 2k5 page here taken from the beta showing the top rated guys for each team.

keRplunK · 07-13-2004, 03:37 PM

Quote:

ronnyballgame said:
If you dont like the ratings, cant you just change them before you start a franchise or whatever to make yourself feel better, I dunno, no one answered my question, where did you find these ratings at!

The screen shots. Bennett should be like a 85 at best.

gambit816 · 07-13-2004, 03:38 PM

Quote:

vinny said:

Quote:

TheDesertFox said:
According to the pics, Green is a 92, and Bennett is a 93. Deuce is a 92 and Portis is a 91.

WTF?! This the biggest BS ever- all 3 of those guys proved last year they were better than Bennett, but Bennett barely plays, has like 15 Career TD's, and gets rated higher?

um, bennet when healthy is better than green deuce and maybe portis. I'd put portis with a 93 as well. watch bennet with a big year.

If we're talking about Deuce McAllister, there's no way that Green is better than he is. Saying he's just as good may be one thing, but certainly not better.

Heelfan71 · 07-13-2004, 04:23 PM

Sega ratings are not like Madden anyways. A player can be rated a 99 and have flaws.

Don't get worked up on the number they are rated.

theBman · 07-13-2004, 04:26 PM

There is no doubt Green is better than McCallister. Just look at their stats. Green: 1883 yrds, 5.3 avg. , 15 Tds. McCallister: 1641 yrds, 4.7 avg., 8 Tds. Both great but Green is a little better.

vinny · 07-13-2004, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Clay_OS said:

Quote:

ReDALeRT2317 said:

Quote:

Clay_OS said:
Ratings are very subjective. I agree 100% that it's how you use them.

Just looking at the Lions, it's pretty laughable that Roy Williams is their highest rates WR on a team with Charles Rogers, Tai Streets, and Az Hakim. It's nice that Roy is getting love, but come on! Rogers and Streets should both be higher than Roy in his Rookie year.

I agree, but didn't Rodgers get injured last season?

Yep...but Michael Bennett is injured every year and he got a 93.

Yeah, Rogers broke his collar bone, but his numbers in the first 5 were quite nice for a Rookie.

Bennet WAS NOT injured his second year. I couln't find injuries on his first year all I could tell was he played in 13 of 16 games. Even that total of missed games assuming he was injured is 11 games. No player can escape injury, its going to happen. If he misses 11 games in his career or 30 for that matter but is still awesome who cares? The year he was healthy was his second year and he got close to 1,300 yards. Obviously he is going to get better not worse in his 4th year and I still think the ratings they gave him are fair. If you don't like it you can change it before you start the franchise.

conboy31 · 07-13-2004, 05:55 PM

I have to admit, when I saw Bennetts rating I almost felt embarrassed. Oh well though, I will be sure to tone with him in my Vikes franchise.

keRplunK · 07-13-2004, 06:30 PM

Quote:

theBman said:
There is no doubt Green is better than McCallister. Just look at their stats. Green: 1883 yrds, 5.3 avg. , 15 Tds. McCallister: 1641 yrds, 4.7 avg., 8 Tds. Both great but Green is a little better.

The Packers have one of the elite oline's in football.

07-13-2004, 03:37 PM	#17
Bondra12 Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Sep 2003	Re: The ratings better be changed... Quote: *ronnyballgame said:* If you dont like the ratings, cant you just change them before you start a franchise or whatever to make yourself feel better, I dunno, no one answered my question, where did you find these ratings at! There are screenshots on the NFL 2k5 page here taken from the beta showing the top rated guys for each team.

07-13-2004, 03:37 PM	#18
keRplunK MVP OVR: 13 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Seattle, Washington	Re: The ratings better be changed... Quote: *ronnyballgame said:* If you dont like the ratings, cant you just change them before you start a franchise or whatever to make yourself feel better, I dunno, no one answered my question, where did you find these ratings at! The screen shots. Bennett should be like a 85 at best.

07-13-2004, 03:38 PM	#19
gambit816 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Feb 2003	Re: The ratings better be changed... Quote: *vinny said:* Quote: *TheDesertFox said:* According to the pics, Green is a 92, and Bennett is a 93. Deuce is a 92 and Portis is a 91. WTF?! This the biggest BS ever- all 3 of those guys proved last year they were better than Bennett, but Bennett barely plays, has like 15 Career TD's, and gets rated higher? um, bennet when healthy is better than green deuce and maybe portis. I'd put portis with a 93 as well. watch bennet with a big year. If we're talking about Deuce McAllister, there's no way that Green is better than he is. Saying he's just as good may be one thing, but certainly not better.

07-13-2004, 04:23 PM	#20
Heelfan71 Hall Of Fame OVR: 44 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Georgia Posts: 19,942 Blog Entries: 4	Re: The ratings better be changed... Sega ratings are not like Madden anyways. A player can be rated a 99 and have flaws. Don't get worked up on the number they are rated.

07-13-2004, 04:26 PM	#21
theBman Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Mar 2003	Re: The ratings better be changed... There is no doubt Green is better than McCallister. Just look at their stats. Green: 1883 yrds, 5.3 avg. , 15 Tds. McCallister: 1641 yrds, 4.7 avg., 8 Tds. Both great but Green is a little better.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

07-13-2004, 04:30 PM	#22
vinny MVP OVR: 17 Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 2,738	Re: The ratings better be changed... Quote: *Clay_OS said:* Quote: *ReDALeRT2317 said:* Quote: *Clay_OS said:* Ratings are very subjective. I agree 100% that it's how you use them. Just looking at the Lions, it's pretty laughable that Roy Williams is their highest rates WR on a team with Charles Rogers, Tai Streets, and Az Hakim. It's nice that Roy is getting love, but come on! Rogers and Streets should both be higher than Roy in his Rookie year. I agree, but didn't Rodgers get injured last season? Yep...but Michael Bennett is injured every year and he got a 93. Yeah, Rogers broke his collar bone, but his numbers in the first 5 were quite nice for a Rookie. Bennet WAS NOT injured his second year. I couln't find injuries on his first year all I could tell was he played in 13 of 16 games. Even that total of missed games assuming he was injured is 11 games. No player can escape injury, its going to happen. If he misses 11 games in his career or 30 for that matter but is still awesome who cares? The year he was healthy was his second year and he got close to 1,300 yards. Obviously he is going to get better not worse in his 4th year and I still think the ratings they gave him are fair. If you don't like it you can change it before you start the franchise.

07-13-2004, 05:55 PM	#23
conboy31 MVP OVR: 17 Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Duluth, MN Blog Entries: 1	Re: The ratings better be changed... I have to admit, when I saw Bennetts rating I almost felt embarrassed. Oh well though, I will be sure to tone with him in my Vikes franchise.

07-13-2004, 06:30 PM	#24
keRplunK MVP OVR: 13 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Seattle, Washington	Re: The ratings better be changed... Quote: *theBman said:* There is no doubt Green is better than McCallister. Just look at their stats. Green: 1883 yrds, 5.3 avg. , 15 Tds. McCallister: 1641 yrds, 4.7 avg., 8 Tds. Both great but Green is a little better. The Packers have one of the elite oline's in football.

More Links

The ratings better be changed...