07-27-2004, 03:40 AM
|
#28
|
Rookie
|
Re: Do we have too high expectations?
Quote:
asianflow said:
When 2k5 first came out almost everything was pretty positive, now everywhere I go on the net the game is being trashed for a number of reasons (poor trade AI, QB Spy bug, Rushing yard bug, framrate issues, etc....) and I know this happens to every major sport game that comes out.
It always starts off positive, then gets trashed and then it dies down and becomes stabalized with positve and constructive critism.
Sometimes I feel like videogame players will never be happy unless it plays exactly like the real sport ... which will never happen.
I feel like most need to lower their expectations and most importantly relax ... it's just a videogame!
it's a weird phenomenon. as games get closer and closer to reality, people begin to nitpick every nuance of the experience more and more as it defies normal conventions. when people used to play madden or ncaa on the SNES or Genesis i couldn't remember complaints about unrealistic AI or the like. the simplistic animations and limited graphic capabilities of systems removed the player from equating it to reality. the current generation games are the opposite. in graphics, presentation, gameplay - it all enters a realm of hyper-reality where people will start to compare the video game to real life. animation quirks, 'questionable' AI, insane trades - this is all a sign that a game is becoming more and more realistic. that partially explains some of the inanity of compalints (they're not holding the ball right when they stiff arm!), to the delay of most of the finer complaints (franchise/sim bugs) weeks after the game's released.
most people don't notice or care of the flaws, others will. in fact it will be near impossible for any game to be declared perfect as most everyone will find some flaw in the implimentation. we have no problem watching 'toy story' and believing its rendered graphics as they didn't attempt to mimic things perfectly. a movie like 'final fantasy', though, simply because of its 'realistic' atmosphere faces much greater scrutiny, even with greater technology rendering the film.
|
|
|