127 Aggression Question

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mbalmer
    Pro
    • Jul 2008
    • 727

    #1

    127 Aggression Question

    I hesitate to ask this for fear of what might be pointed out to me that I haven't noticed yet, but here goes.

    For about 3 months now I have been playing, off and on, with Fun-n-Guns 10-11 roster with the aggression turned up for every player to 127. Last night I finally got around to downloading Dolphin's 96 roster (haven't played it yet but looks really good) and the 11-12 roster on his website. I changed everyones aggression to 127 and went and played Packers v Bears(me). I love the way the game plays with the aggression jacked all the way up. I feel that people catch the ball better especially running backs coming out of the backfield.

    What are the negatives to this 127 aggression? At this point I can't find any.

    I will admit that I haven't played multiple games a day for several weeks in a row, so I haven't had extensive time with it yet, but now that football is starting I am going to be playing more.
    Last edited by Mbalmer; 08-30-2011, 11:50 AM. Reason: spell
    If a loved one is expecting a baby or just had one, please read about Craniosynostosis. It is a common birth defect that can sometimes be overlooked by doctors.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craniosynostosis
  • airkix72
    Rookie
    • Aug 2005
    • 9

    #2
    Re: 127 Aggression Question

    I know one negative to 127 aggression is the CBs bite on the play action pass every time. The opposite is true, i.e. 0 aggression will cause them to never bite on play action.

    Comment

    Working...