GillBoldberg's 2012-13 NFL Roster

[GillBoldberg]

I gave it a shot, didn't really see a difference

[chibears96]

Quote: Originally Posted by GillBoldberg

I gave it a shot, didn't really see a difference

I see you lowered aggression for corners. That make the passing game alot worse. Also what sliders are you using?

[GillBoldberg]

I had aggression higher before but it seemed like there were too many batted balls. Maybe my mind is playing tricks on me lol.

I'm using Bill's with some slight modifications

[GillBoldberg]

Cincinnati Bengals at Philadelphia Eagles
Jan 1,	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Cincinnati Bengals ()	17	10	3	10	40
Philadelphia Eagles ()	3	14	7	10	34

Team Stats Comparison
	CIN	PHI
Total Offense
Rushing Yards	206	228
Passing Yards	325	203
First Downs	16	25
Punt Return Yards
Kick Return Yards
Total Yards	531	431
Turnovers	1	0
3rd Down Converstion	8/12	9/15
4th Down Conversion
2-Point Conversion
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals
Penalties	4	4
Posession Time

Cincinnati Bengals PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Dalton 17/33 325 2 1 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Green-Ellis 26 201 7.7 2 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Green 5 90 18.0 1 Gresham 4 52 13.0 0 Tate 4 94 23.5 1 Shipley 2 71 35.5 0

Philadelphia Eagles PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Vick 19/35 203 1 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Lewis 17 111 6.5 2 McCoy 9 38 4.2 0 Brown 6 44 7.3 1 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Jackson 6 59 9.8 0 Cooper 3 45 15.0 0 Maclin 2 46 23.0 0

Some stats Eagles (me) vs Bengals. 8 min quarters; got some better cpu qb play (thanks chibears).

McCoy got injured in the 2nd quarter so I had to rely on the backups.

My safeties got torched on a few long passes and Green-Ellis was manageable until he busted 2 long runs which boosted his numbers.

Overall it was a pretty fun game, except for the loss lol.

[GillBoldberg]

Chicago Bears at Denver Broncos
Jan 1,	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Chicago Bears ()	3	7	0	0	10
Denver Broncos ()	3	17	3	0	23

Team Stats Comparison
	CHI	DEN
Total Offense
Rushing Yards	109	133
Passing Yards	231	168
First Downs	18	16
Punt Return Yards
Kick Return Yards
Total Yards	340	301
Turnovers	4	0
3rd Down Converstion
4th Down Conversion
2-Point Conversion
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals
Penalties
Posession Time

Chicago Bears PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Cutler 20/33 231 1 2 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD Forte 19 83 4.4 0 Bush 6 15 2.5 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Marshall 8 88 11.0 0 Bennett 5 70 14.0 0 Hester 3 25 8.3 0

Denver Broncos PASSING C/A YDS TD INT Manning 19/29 168 1 0 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD McGahee 26 112 4.3 1 Ball 6 22 3.7 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD Thomas 5 83 16.6 0 Decker 4 43 10.7 0 Caldwell 2 31 15.5 0

Broncos (me) vs Bears
--

Closer game than the score indicates. Turnovers and a dropped TD catch by Hester in the endzone really hurt the bears.

In the 2nd half I wasn't as aggressive with Manning, rode McGahee to drain the clock.

I'll have another update up tonight

[dophin26]

Quote: Originally Posted by chibears96

I see you lowered aggression for corners. That make the passing game alot worse. Also what sliders are you using?

I respectfully disagree with that. Corners should have low or 0 aggression. It eliminates the circling of DBs and yields good results. FS and SS (especially SS) I always give high(er) AGG ratings.

[Rickster101]

Quote: Originally Posted by dophin26

I respectfully disagree with that. Corners should have low or 0 aggression. It eliminates the circling of DBs and yields good results. FS and SS (especially SS) I always give high(er) AGG ratings.

I don't see going with zero aggression myself and wouldn't go any lower then the games actual default of 25,that zero would probably be something I go with if the player is inconsistent a rookie or a lower tier defender.

Aggressiveness doesn't effect all players in the same way particularly pass defenders, for defensive backs it effects their basic awareness defending against the pass and if set too high could result in an overly aggressive style of play which to some could be a good thing yielding more pass deflections and a more physical confrontation on the field of play however the downside is that it could result in more pass interference calls.

I'd rather have that as opposed to seeing a defender running around in circles lost and confused but to each his own seeing DBs running in that circle motion looks dumb in my opinion.

I do somewhat agree with Dolphin the games default starting out at 25 and adjusting from there but most def don't see it being set at zero unless the player is that rookie or lower tier player.

There is however something to be said about higher aggressive ratings and FunNGun has proven that if edited correctly the game could be a fun no pun intended FunNGun.....anyway its a situation where you'd have to really observe and watch whats going on seeing your players act and re-act to gameplay and watching the CPU vs CPU is a good way to see this.

As for slider adjustments they are and always will be something subjective due to individual likes and playing styles....I'm a pro style sim guy myself and enjoy watching a game as if it were a live broadcast yielding realistic results and seeing DBs running in circles again is just a dumb way to enjoy a game if he's overly aggressive and gets flagged then that is what should happen or a big hit and fumble great but no way seeing DBs running around in circles due to poor editing there is no excuse for that.




The Boss...Lead Man
Rickster101

[GillBoldberg]

I have the aggression set as a base at 24 right now for CB's. I haven't seen any wonky CB play yet. Still testing it a bit but so far been seeing some pretty good results. There are more pass interference calls, but that's a good thing in my book.