You be the Playoff Selection Committee!

[motorox8]

Hey guys, since you were all such a help in Pocketscout's dynasty I was hoping you could do the same for me.

I run a 4-team playoff, just like Pocketscout, but I have a really rare situation. Theirs a clear number 1 seed, having gone 13-0 in a Power-5 conference, but after that the best Power-5 schools are all 2 and 3 loss teams! Not even a single 1 loss team! So, I need some help trying to pick what 2-3 loss team deserves the last spot in my playoff bracket. I'm also going to list below who I believe should be the 2 and 3 seed just to make your you agree with me, let me know if you would rank them differently!

===============================================
2 Seed: Power 5 School (Conference A - Avg. Rank = 12.2)
Record = 11-2 - Power 5 Conference Champion

**Losses**
7-5 OOC non-power 5 opponent
9-3 Conference opponent(Ranked 7th in latest polls)

**Best Wins**
8-4 Independent(Ranked 9th)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 19th)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 21st)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 14th)
10-3 Conference opponent(Ranked 6th)

===============================================
3 Seed: Power 5 School (Conference B - Avg. Rank = 23.0)
Record = 10-2 - Power 5 Conference Champion

**Losses**
3-9 Conference opponent
9-3 Conference opponent(Ranked 10th)

**Best Wins**
10-3 OOC power 5 opponent(Ranked 6th)
10-2 Conference opponent(Ranked 5th)
7-5 Conference opponent
7-5 Conference opponent

===============================================
4 Seed Contenders:

Team A: Power 5 school (Conference C - Avg. Rank = 28.2)
Record = 10-3 - Power 5 Conference Champion

**Losses**
9-4 OOC non-power 5 opponent
4-8 Conference opponent
7-5 OOC power 5 opponent

**Best Wins**
9-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 17th) [Beat them twice]
9-3 Conference opponent(Ranked 13th)
[No other wins versus above .500 teams]

===============================================
Team B: Power 5 School (Conference A - Avg. Rank = 12.2)
Record = 9-3 Power 5 Conference Runner-up (Did not play in CC game)

**Losses**
9-4 OOC Opponent(Ranked 17th)
5-7 Conference opponent
6-6 Conference opponent

**Best Wins**
11-2 Conference opponent(#2 Seed)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 14th)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 21st)
7-5 Conference opponent
7-5 Conference opponent

===============================================
Team C: Non-power 5 School (Conference D - Avg. Rank = 29.2)
Record = 12-1 - Non-power 5 Conference Champion

**Losses**
6-6 Conference opponent [In OT]

**Key Wins**
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 16th)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 24th)
8-5 Conference opponent(Ranked 25th)
8-4 Conference opponent
7-5 Conference opponent
2 Wins versus Power 5 schools (Both teams flopped to a 3-9 record however)

So you know, I run a Relegation system with the non-power 5 conferences. Team C is in the top tier, and since this is year 2020 of this dynasty the conference is pretty tough and not very far off from a power-5 conference (As shown by the average rankings of the teams in the conferences)

===============================================
Team D: Power 5 School (Conference E - Avg. Rank = 27.2)
Record = 9-4 - Power 5 Conference Champion

**Losses**
8-4 OOC Non-power 5 opponent(Ranked 24th)
9-3 OOC Non-power 5 Opponent
7-5 Conference opponent
6-6 Conference opponent

**Key Wins**
9-3 Conference opponent(Ranked 18th)
8-4 Conference opponent(Ranked 22nd)
8-4 Conference opponent
7-6 Conference opponent [Beat twice]

===============================================

Sorry for all the options, but theirs just a lot of teams that are bunched together at the top. So, what do you guys think?

[RedRaider10]

I think Team C is the best option, hard not to go with a 12-1 team. Had to decide between B and C but I think C is more consistent.

[TheRosterMaster]

Quote: Originally Posted by RedRaider10

I think Team C is the best option, hard not to go with a 12-1 team. Had to decide between B and C but I think C is more consistent.

I agree with this. It was a hard decision for me because team B lost to a .500 team and a team that was under .500 rather than just that .500 team and only lose that 1 game like Team C. As said, Team C get's my vote.

[wonzer21]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheRosterMaster

I agree with this. It was a hard decision for me because team B lost to a .500 team and a team that was under .500 rather than just that .500 team and only lose that 1 game like Team C. As said, Team C get's my vote.

Team C is defiantly the better choice