FM2011 Database (player rating issues, adjustments, suggestions etc.)

[Hutton]

This is always bone of contention for me, & I enjoy dialogue related to player ratings.

This seems to be a topic that the ratings people at the sigames forums don't like to discuss, so I'd like the opportunity to discuss it here with some of the very knowledgeable people here.

SPOILER FOR PEOPLE THAT DON'T WANT TO KNOW CA/PA from full game:







My first issue, Spurs highest rated player is.......wait for it........

Wait........

Spoiler

William Gallas! Yes, THE Williams Gallas.

NAME: CA / PA
GALLAS 164 175
MODRIC 163 173
GOMES 163 167
Ledley King 161 161
Van der Vaart 156 163

Other notables:
Bale 150 175
Defoe 150 155
Huddlestone 146 165

How on earth is William Gallas ever considered Spurs best player by anyone? He's been bloody awful the last 2 years, and has been horrible for Spurs this year.

I know a arsenal person is responsible for rating him, so this begs the question, if arsenal players are rated on such a different scale/standard then how is this at all fair to Spurs players?

Let's look at the arsenal top players:

Fabregas 179 186
Arshavin 171 171
van Persie 170 176
Sanga 161 168
Clichy 161 172
Nasri 159 175
Chamakh 159 165

So that looks fine, other than the fact that Gallas would currently be the 4th best arsenal player, better than fellow CB's Vermaelen, Squillaci, Koscielny & Djourou. This is flat out WRONG.

IMO Gallas needs a drastic ratings reduction, probably to CA around 140-145 (Bassong is a 144 for Spurs).

[Whitesox]

Note: [ spoiler ] and [ /spolier ] will actually hide the info.

[Tomasperez9]

Can we please, please, please, please post ALL CA/PA in a spoiler tag?

[mdbussen]

Sports Interactive have a thread where you can post issues with the database. I would post your complaints there - frankly it does no good posting it here!

http://community.sigames.com/showthr...l)-Data-Issues

[Hutton]

Quote: Originally Posted by mdbussen

Sports Interactive have a thread where you can post issues with the database. I would post your complaints there - frankly it does no good posting it here! http://community.sigames.com/showthread.php/230268-ENGLAND-Tottenham-Hotspur-(Official)-Data-Issues

I do post there, but I would like the input of the knowledgeable people here, where a good discussion can take place.

At Sigames forums the data researchers just seem to insult people's opinions & say that rating players differently isn't a "Data Issue", whatever the hell that even means lol.

Bale being underrated isn't a data issue, Gallas being over rated isn't a data issue....yawn.

If you don't like this topic then don't participate. Thanks & move along kind mate.

[mdbussen]

Quote: Originally Posted by Hutton

At Sigames forums the data researchers just seem to insult people's opinions & say that rating players differently isn't a "Data Issue", whatever the hell that even means lol.

I would agree with that assessment from the brief time I have posted in the data issues threads. I guess I was under the impression from your initial post that you actually wanted to see things changed to reflect your opinion of the players rather than have a discussion about the ratings themselves.

Quote: Originally Posted by Hutton

If you don't like this topic then don't participate. Thanks & move along kind mate.

Are you an SI data researcher by any chance?

[Hutton]

Quote: Originally Posted by mdbussen

I would agree with that assessment from the brief time I have posted in the data issues threads. I guess I was under the impression from your initial post that you actually wanted to see things changed to reflect your opinion of the players rather than have a discussion about the ratings themselves.

No, I just want to hear other people's opinions about why such & such player wasn't rated correctly by the Sigames researcher. I like the debate that follows intelligent conversation about player skills. That debate seems to always be pushed aside at the official forums .

I watch a lot of footy, and I play a lot of FM, so if while watching a watch a certain player jumps out at me as being very skilled at a particular aspect(s) of the game I will typically look them up in the FM db, and try to get a gauge on how they were rated.

Doing that obviously I come across some issues

Spoiler

Gallas being the highest CA rated Spur for example

That said, I would like similar input from other people here who think a certain player isn't playing to their real like skills/tendencies in the game. Label me a dork, but I find that type of discussion enthralling...

Quote:

Are you an SI data researcher by any chance?

No, absolutely not. The closest I would ever come would be trying to recreate my Sunday league team lol.

I do however spend a lot of time analyzing the FM db, trying to get into the mind of a researcher.

[Perceptor]

Gallas has been awful this year (from Arsenal to Spurs will do that), but he was actually not bad last season at least over the early part. He and Vermaelen did form a solid partnership.

I think where you would be worried is that VDV is underrated. That guy should be rated higher because he's a quality player that was on the bench at real Madrid.

I think Bale is about right although his potential could be higher. With the next update patch, his rating will go up given his performances this year

In any event, if you think the ratings are too high/low, change them. I usually do that when players rise in form out of nowhere and I feel like I should change Wilshere from a

Spoiler

-9 to a -10

given how he's done so far...