Weird potentials

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zack4070
    Rookie
    • Jul 2012
    • 481

    #46
    Re: Weird potentials

    Originally posted by DAWNofALDUIN
    What's the knock on Coors Field? You make it sound as though its not a hitters ballpark. Players love hitting in Coors Field because of the less "friction force" in the air.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Where in this post (or any in that matter) did I knock Coors Field???
    Gal 2:20

    Comment

    • DAWNofALDUIN
      Rookie
      • Feb 2013
      • 45

      #47
      Originally posted by zack4070
      Where in this post (or any in that matter) did I knock Coors Field???
      You kept saying "but he plays in Coors Field". If I misunderstood you then apologies. Idk..


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • DAWNofALDUIN
        Rookie
        • Feb 2013
        • 45

        #48
        I re-read it and think I know how you meant it now.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • zack4070
          Rookie
          • Jul 2012
          • 481

          #49
          Re: Weird potentials

          Originally posted by DAWNofALDUIN
          I re-read it and think I know how you meant it now.


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          oh haha. No prob. In fact I think Coors has since leveled out since they added the humidor, which I wish they wouldn't of because it made Coors so unique. You never know when you'll see another 26-7 score!!!!!!!!
          Gal 2:20

          Comment

          • seanjeezy
            The Future
            • Aug 2009
            • 3347

            #50
            Re: Weird potentials

            The thing that bothers me the most is how some guys have had multiple seasons of disappointment, yet they still have the same potential from MLB 10 or 11. Also, the number of fringe major leaguers in their late 20's receiving B's is ridiculous... Maybe there's something missing here, If I had to guess I would say that potential doesn't matter after a certain age, maybe around 27? That's pretty much the only conclusion I can come to...

            Most importantly I just want there to be some kind of consistency... Why is Triunfel an A and Simmons a B? Triunfel isn't even half the player Andrelton is, on offense or on defense... Barret Browning is a B but Stephen Pryor is a C? Browning is a 28 year old AAAA reliever with a high 80's fastball while Pryor is 23 with a 98 mph fastball and closer potential... I just don't get it.
            Bakin' soda, I got bakin' soda

            Comment

            • Nooooovak
              Rookie
              • Jan 2012
              • 133

              #51
              Re: Weird potentials

              Originally posted by Officerbill8
              Yes. Cargo strikes out a ton. But his .370 obp the past 3 seasons (20th best) more than makes up for it...

              Let's dismiss Mike Trout here (I need more than 1 season)...

              with that said....EVERY elite player even has their faults...it's not like there is a perfect player...

              Cabrera can't run and can't field, Pujols can't run anymore, Cano can't run, etc, etc, etc.

              And don't give me his WAR stats. If those stats meant anything Trout would have won the MVP this past season.
              We are just going to have to agree to disagree. I don't think he is quite at an elite level and you do. Let's just leave it at that.
              Mariners Baseball | Lakers Basketball | Rams Football

              Comment

              • yanksdaniel99
                MVP
                • Jun 2011
                • 1185

                #52
                Re: Weird potentials

                Originally posted by seanjeezy
                The thing that bothers me the most is how some guys have had multiple seasons of disappointment, yet they still have the same potential from MLB 10 or 11. Also, the number of fringe major leaguers in their late 20's receiving B's is ridiculous... Maybe there's something missing here, If I had to guess I would say that potential doesn't matter after a certain age, maybe around 27? That's pretty much the only conclusion I can come to...

                Most importantly I just want there to be some kind of consistency... Why is Triunfel an A and Simmons a B? Triunfel isn't even half the player Andrelton is, on offense or on defense... Barret Browning is a B but Stephen Pryor is a C? Browning is a 28 year old AAAA reliever with a high 80's fastball while Pryor is 23 with a 98 mph fastball and closer potential... I just don't get it.
                Indeed, the lack of consistency is the worst part, its atrocious.

                Comment

                • DAWNofALDUIN
                  Rookie
                  • Feb 2013
                  • 45

                  #53
                  Originally posted by Nooooovak
                  We are just going to have to agree to disagree. I don't think he is quite at an elite level and you do. Let's just leave it at that.
                  According to the 30 + mock drafts I've done so far he has been picked in the top 8 every single one.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • MrOldboy
                    MVP
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 2653

                    #54
                    Re: Weird potentials

                    Ok so solutions?

                    If the potentials we feel are incorrect, can we make a new roster with OSFM base and recreate the MLB players with "wrong" potentials?

                    Is there a way to replace a player and keep his career stats and such? I'm not huge into doing detailed roster editing, I just change the pitch repertoires, stances, basic ratings and such as I see fit once I download OSFM.

                    Even if you lost their stats and stuff would anyone sacrifice that stuff for a more "accurate" potential? Or would people rather deal with the potentials and have the stats and things that come with the SCEA rosters?

                    Comment

                    • yanksdaniel99
                      MVP
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 1185

                      #55
                      Re: Weird potentials

                      Originally posted by MrOldboy
                      Ok so solutions?

                      If the potentials we feel are incorrect, can we make a new roster with OSFM base and recreate the MLB players with "wrong" potentials?

                      Is there a way to replace a player and keep his career stats and such? I'm not huge into doing detailed roster editing, I just change the pitch repertoires, stances, basic ratings and such as I see fit once I download OSFM.

                      Even if you lost their stats and stuff would anyone sacrifice that stuff for a more "accurate" potential? Or would people rather deal with the potentials and have the stats and things that come with the SCEA rosters?
                      No way to keep stats if you recreate players.

                      3 options

                      1) Hope some of these get changed in the next roster update

                      2) If not, come up with a shorter list of guys and recreate them. Lot of guys have little to no stats so its fine recreating them, lot of work tho. Guys with significant service time are the tough ones to make decisions on.

                      3) Deal with it

                      Option 2 is my choice.

                      Comment

                      • Nooooovak
                        Rookie
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 133

                        #56
                        Re: Weird potentials

                        Originally posted by DAWNofALDUIN
                        According to the 30 + mock drafts I've done so far he has been picked in the top 8 every single one.
                        Not entirely sure what that has to do with anything. Fantasy baseball is a whole different ball game, dude.

                        Once again, I'm not saying he is nowhere near an elite level, I feel he is just underneath it. I'm not saying, "Oh my god Cargo is so overrated blah blah blah!". I legitimately feel that he is right on the cusp of becoming an elite player and that he will become one if he can put together a full, healthy season. If you don't agree with me, that is fine, but I just can't agree with you that a guy who has a combined 5.5 WAR the last two years is a premiere player in baseball.
                        Last edited by Nooooovak; 03-03-2013, 04:19 AM.
                        Mariners Baseball | Lakers Basketball | Rams Football

                        Comment

                        • MrOldboy
                          MVP
                          • Feb 2011
                          • 2653

                          #57
                          Re: Weird potentials

                          Originally posted by yanksdaniel99
                          No way to keep stats if you recreate players.

                          3 options

                          1) Hope some of these get changed in the next roster update

                          2) If not, come up with a shorter list of guys and recreate them. Lot of guys have little to no stats so its fine recreating them, lot of work tho. Guys with significant service time are the tough ones to make decisions on.

                          3) Deal with it

                          Option 2 is my choice.
                          That is what I thought. I'm sure if people on here feel they need changing a roster set will get made that have the "correct" potentials for MLB players, but incorrect service time and stats.

                          I can see players like Belt or Britton becoming an issue for the hardcore-sim franchise players since the potential seems to be such a sure thing.

                          For them option 2 seems like the most logical route to take, make a roster set to suite their needs.

                          Comment

                          • geisterhome
                            MVP
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 2101

                            #58
                            Originally posted by seanjeezy
                            After watching the 40-man roster vid by shake (thanks by the way), I couldn't help but notice some odd potential ratings... yanksdaniel pm'd me and shared the same sentiment as I did, so I decided it was a good idea to make a thread and hopefully there's a chance these will be changed in the future:

                            Spoiler


                            Anyone notice any other oddities? This list is my personal opinion so obviously it isn't the gospel, I just don't want to see Bryce Harper or Mike Trout be traded for Carlos Triunfel haha
                            great list! make much more sense to me than there default ones.

                            Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
                            Spending time with Jesus!

                            -Glad to be an Operation Sports Member!-

                            Comment

                            • js3512
                              Banned
                              • May 2012
                              • 437

                              #59
                              Tony Campana as a B is just laughable. C- at most. He's fast and he can field but couldn't hit his way out of a cardboard box lol

                              Comment

                              • metsfan4life1
                                Pro
                                • Jan 2012
                                • 956

                                #60
                                Re: Weird potentials

                                Originally posted by seanjeezy
                                The thing that bothers me the most is how some guys have had multiple seasons of disappointment, yet they still have the same potential from MLB 10 or 11. Also, the number of fringe major leaguers in their late 20's receiving B's is ridiculous... Maybe there's something missing here, If I had to guess I would say that potential doesn't matter after a certain age, maybe around 27? That's pretty much the only conclusion I can come to...

                                Most importantly I just want there to be some kind of consistency... Why is Triunfel an A and Simmons a B? Triunfel isn't even half the player Andrelton is, on offense or on defense... Barret Browning is a B but Stephen Pryor is a C? Browning is a 28 year old AAAA reliever with a high 80's fastball while Pryor is 23 with a 98 mph fastball and closer potential... I just don't get it.
                                The way some players are rated in this game(overall) is head scratching too.
                                Harvey's Better

                                Comment

                                Working...