Weird potentials
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Weird potentials
Its actually skill dependent, different skill sets peak at different ages... For the comm day/wishlist thread I wrote a pretty lengthy post about age/skill curves, I'll just link the study - http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/201...r-aging-curvesYou really should see regression starting after 27/28....just being honest about factual analysis. The idea that 28-31 is peak is factually incorrect.
Player have their best seasons ages 24-28. After that, numbers regress.
ETA: Yeah, I am with you though, in the situation of late bloomers. I don't think ANY players should be going up after 30/31, and MOST players should already be regressing at age 29.
But yeah, what you're saying is the general gist of the article.Bakin' soda, I got bakin' sodaComment
-
Re: Weird potentials
Its actually skill dependent, different skill sets peak at different ages... For the comm day/wishlist thread I wrote a pretty lengthy post about age/skill curves, I'll just link the study - http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/201...r-aging-curves
But yeah, what you're saying is the general gist of the article.
Yeah, I remember that article. That's what I was going for, fast players usually age better, and players with a better approach at the plate also age better because they don't rely entirely on physical gifts, so they can compensate and have something to fall back on when their body starts to slow down.
And thank you for posting the perfect article. Also a good reminder as a piece of help for a project I am working on for the SABR conference.Comment

Comment