The positive side of player regression

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Threeebs
    Rookie
    • Mar 2013
    • 451

    #16
    Re: The positive side of player regression

    Originally posted by pistolpete
    I am curious to see this. I may need to move him for whatever I can get.


    I don't remember what he starts at, but he only drops to an 87 or 88 at the end of the first season. Worth keeping the two years to help grab a playoff spot.
    T.K.

    Comment

    • pistolpete
      MVP
      • Jun 2004
      • 1816

      #17
      Re: The positive side of player regression

      Originally posted by Threeebs

      I don't remember what he starts at, but he only drops to an 87 or 88 at the end of the first season. Worth keeping the two years to help grab a playoff spot.
      That sounds about what he starts at. I think the big fellas Braun and Hart are 99 and 94, and Lucroy and Ramirez are 88s-ish.

      Comment

      • Threeebs
        Rookie
        • Mar 2013
        • 451

        #18
        Re: The positive side of player regression

        Originally posted by pistolpete
        That sounds about what he starts at. I think the big fellas Braun and Hart are 99 and 94, and Lucroy and Ramirez are 88s-ish.


        I coulda swore it was 87 at year's end but I'm probably wrong. Either that or he doesn't regress at all then...
        T.K.

        Comment

        • bautistabomb
          Rookie
          • Feb 2013
          • 184

          #19
          Re: The positive side of player regression

          I really don't mind the big regressions. Wish it was a bit more randomissed but I can live with it. If you really want you can actually randomize it yourself fairly easily. Make your own spreadsheet and insert values of how much a player would drop. Use a random number generator and then in the off season just go in an adjust all the player ratings yourself using the results from the random number generator. So simple. It would take some work to adjust all the over 35 players, but really there are only maybe on average of 2 or 3 per team. So you might have to edit 100 players tops.

          Comment

          • Threeebs
            Rookie
            • Mar 2013
            • 451

            #20
            Re: The positive side of player regression

            Originally posted by bautistabomb
            I really don't mind the big regressions. Wish it was a bit more randomissed but I can live with it. If you really want you can actually randomize it yourself fairly easily. Make your own spreadsheet and insert values of how much a player would drop. Use a random number generator and then in the off season just go in an adjust all the player ratings yourself using the results from the random number generator. So simple. It would take some work to adjust all the over 35 players, but really there are only maybe on average of 2 or 3 per team. So you might have to edit 100 players tops.


            The Yankees have a 25 man roster filled with 35+ aged players
            T.K.

            Comment

            Working...