The positive side of player regression
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: The positive side of player regression
That sounds about what he starts at. I think the big fellas Braun and Hart are 99 and 94, and Lucroy and Ramirez are 88s-ish.Comment
-
Re: The positive side of player regression
I coulda swore it was 87 at year's end but I'm probably wrong. Either that or he doesn't regress at all then...T.K.Comment
-
Re: The positive side of player regression
I really don't mind the big regressions. Wish it was a bit more randomissed but I can live with it. If you really want you can actually randomize it yourself fairly easily. Make your own spreadsheet and insert values of how much a player would drop. Use a random number generator and then in the off season just go in an adjust all the player ratings yourself using the results from the random number generator. So simple. It would take some work to adjust all the over 35 players, but really there are only maybe on average of 2 or 3 per team. So you might have to edit 100 players tops.Comment
-
Re: The positive side of player regression
I really don't mind the big regressions. Wish it was a bit more randomissed but I can live with it. If you really want you can actually randomize it yourself fairly easily. Make your own spreadsheet and insert values of how much a player would drop. Use a random number generator and then in the off season just go in an adjust all the player ratings yourself using the results from the random number generator. So simple. It would take some work to adjust all the over 35 players, but really there are only maybe on average of 2 or 3 per team. So you might have to edit 100 players tops.
The Yankees have a 25 man roster filled with 35+ aged players
T.K.Comment

Comment