Smart Counts

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 3rdAnswer
    Regular Cat Records®
    • Sep 2002
    • 10845

    #61
    Re: Smart Counts

    <font color="blue"> I'm starting to not like Smart Counts anymore. My pitchers get tired WAY too soon. When I wasn't using them, I threw a 3-hitter with Tim Hudson, but all of my other starters get tired after 3 innings work. I got beat 15-3 my last game, against the Mariners. </font>
    -Jay Illestrate, Emcee/Producer/Graphic Artist
    www.REGULARCATRECORDS.COM
    New York Giants - Duke Blue Devils - Charlotte Hornets - San Antonio Spurs

    Comment

    • Cardot
      I'm not on InstantFace.
      • Feb 2003
      • 6164

      #62
      Re: Smart Counts

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      Bacardi151 said:
      what level do you guys play at were you see a decent number of walks by the CPU? Part of the problem is me swinging at everything, but its because everything looks like a strike


      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
      I am also very impatient at the plate, and the only way I'll ever walk is with generated counts. I would never be able to watch 4 pitches go by. But when I step up to the plate with a 3-0 count and my #9 batter, there is some incentive to take a pitch or two. With the random count, I would get a couple walks if I was patient. With smart counts I got 15 walks in one game when the CPU went midevil on the Tampa pitchers.....that was a bit much and I gave up on the smart counts. Now I am using 2-1 counts, and I can draw a few walks if I am patient...which I am usually not ofcourse.

      I know that you like the leisurely pace of the game and avoid the generated counts, but you may want to give them a try if you haven't already.

      Comment

      • Cardot
        I'm not on InstantFace.
        • Feb 2003
        • 6164

        #63
        Re: Smart Counts

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        Bacardi151 said:
        what level do you guys play at were you see a decent number of walks by the CPU? Part of the problem is me swinging at everything, but its because everything looks like a strike


        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
        I am also very impatient at the plate, and the only way I'll ever walk is with generated counts. I would never be able to watch 4 pitches go by. But when I step up to the plate with a 3-0 count and my #9 batter, there is some incentive to take a pitch or two. With the random count, I would get a couple walks if I was patient. With smart counts I got 15 walks in one game when the CPU went midevil on the Tampa pitchers.....that was a bit much and I gave up on the smart counts. Now I am using 2-1 counts, and I can draw a few walks if I am patient...which I am usually not ofcourse.

        I know that you like the leisurely pace of the game and avoid the generated counts, but you may want to give them a try if you haven't already.

        Comment

        • Cardot
          I'm not on InstantFace.
          • Feb 2003
          • 6164

          #64
          Re: Smart Counts

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          Bacardi151 said:
          what level do you guys play at were you see a decent number of walks by the CPU? Part of the problem is me swinging at everything, but its because everything looks like a strike


          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
          I am also very impatient at the plate, and the only way I'll ever walk is with generated counts. I would never be able to watch 4 pitches go by. But when I step up to the plate with a 3-0 count and my #9 batter, there is some incentive to take a pitch or two. With the random count, I would get a couple walks if I was patient. With smart counts I got 15 walks in one game when the CPU went midevil on the Tampa pitchers.....that was a bit much and I gave up on the smart counts. Now I am using 2-1 counts, and I can draw a few walks if I am patient...which I am usually not ofcourse.

          I know that you like the leisurely pace of the game and avoid the generated counts, but you may want to give them a try if you haven't already.

          Comment

          • Giants2003
            Pro
            • Mar 2003
            • 676

            #65
            Re: Smart Counts

            I like both smart and random counts but my pitching is too dominent this way i am now 5-1 to start my season and my team era is 1.94 best in the Bigs (Giants) although i just finished a 3 game set with the pooor hitting Padres team Avg, 170

            Comment

            • Giants2003
              Pro
              • Mar 2003
              • 676

              #66
              Re: Smart Counts

              I like both smart and random counts but my pitching is too dominent this way i am now 5-1 to start my season and my team era is 1.94 best in the Bigs (Giants) although i just finished a 3 game set with the pooor hitting Padres team Avg, 170

              Comment

              • Giants2003
                Pro
                • Mar 2003
                • 676

                #67
                Re: Smart Counts

                I like both smart and random counts but my pitching is too dominent this way i am now 5-1 to start my season and my team era is 1.94 best in the Bigs (Giants) although i just finished a 3 game set with the pooor hitting Padres team Avg, 170

                Comment

                Working...