Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

[JRod]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

The IGN editors sure don't play real baseball...let's swing at everything and let's pitch everything down the middle.

[MuffinMcFluffin]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

Now I know that it was Extra Bases POTD, but man, Hunter got WORKED!

I'm guessing they were just showing them off rather than that being what an average game is like.

[MuffinMcFluffin]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

Now I know that it was Extra Bases POTD, but man, Hunter got WORKED!

I'm guessing they were just showing them off rather than that being what an average game is like.

[MuffinMcFluffin]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

Now I know that it was Extra Bases POTD, but man, Hunter got WORKED!

I'm guessing they were just showing them off rather than that being what an average game is like.

[cappadocian]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

The three things that I really liked in that movie were:

hits deep to the gap in right-center bounced off the wall, or at least I think they did so. In Media Player the movie box was sort of small, so I really couldn't see it that well.

The runner getting caught between first and second, and getting tagged out.

The diving catch by the second baseman. That looked _very_ realistic, hell I could of sworn it was an actual game at that point.

The one thing I am not so sure about is where the catcher tagged out some runners. It seemed as if the runners were running through the catcher, or that the tag motions were limited in number of frames.

Otherwise, I think it's very clear that this game is going to beat all the others this year hands-down. Yeah, movies and screens are just that, nothing more, and I've seen proof this year (I think it was the ESPN Baseball game) where certain screen shots have been altered to take out no-no's. Still, in between all the stuff that we've seen so far, there is a very good reason why we are seeing a lot more from MVP 2004 than the others. And, it has nothing to do with marketing funds or know-how

[cappadocian]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

The three things that I really liked in that movie were:

hits deep to the gap in right-center bounced off the wall, or at least I think they did so. In Media Player the movie box was sort of small, so I really couldn't see it that well.

The runner getting caught between first and second, and getting tagged out.

The diving catch by the second baseman. That looked _very_ realistic, hell I could of sworn it was an actual game at that point.

The one thing I am not so sure about is where the catcher tagged out some runners. It seemed as if the runners were running through the catcher, or that the tag motions were limited in number of frames.

Otherwise, I think it's very clear that this game is going to beat all the others this year hands-down. Yeah, movies and screens are just that, nothing more, and I've seen proof this year (I think it was the ESPN Baseball game) where certain screen shots have been altered to take out no-no's. Still, in between all the stuff that we've seen so far, there is a very good reason why we are seeing a lot more from MVP 2004 than the others. And, it has nothing to do with marketing funds or know-how

[cappadocian]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

The three things that I really liked in that movie were:

hits deep to the gap in right-center bounced off the wall, or at least I think they did so. In Media Player the movie box was sort of small, so I really couldn't see it that well.

The runner getting caught between first and second, and getting tagged out.

The diving catch by the second baseman. That looked _very_ realistic, hell I could of sworn it was an actual game at that point.

The one thing I am not so sure about is where the catcher tagged out some runners. It seemed as if the runners were running through the catcher, or that the tag motions were limited in number of frames.

Otherwise, I think it's very clear that this game is going to beat all the others this year hands-down. Yeah, movies and screens are just that, nothing more, and I've seen proof this year (I think it was the ESPN Baseball game) where certain screen shots have been altered to take out no-no's. Still, in between all the stuff that we've seen so far, there is a very good reason why we are seeing a lot more from MVP 2004 than the others. And, it has nothing to do with marketing funds or know-how

[8bit]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

wayyyyy too many hits

[8bit]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

wayyyyy too many hits

[8bit]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

wayyyyy too many hits

[RoyalBoyle78]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

8bit- did you every think it was on rookie level?

[RoyalBoyle78]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

8bit- did you every think it was on rookie level?

[RoyalBoyle78]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

8bit- did you every think it was on rookie level?

[MuffinMcFluffin]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
FootballForever said:
8bit- did you every think it was on rookie level?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I was wondering that, but they also pimped the CPU's extra base-hits.

Hopefully it was just a slider change?

[MuffinMcFluffin]

Re: IGN POTD: Extra Bases

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
FootballForever said:
8bit- did you every think it was on rookie level?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I was wondering that, but they also pimped the CPU's extra base-hits.

Hopefully it was just a slider change?