MyTeam Mobile Discussion

[Denkiteki]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

What a strange RC that was. I think Cd should structure it so you win the rewards for the tier below you as well. Obviously they might not be able to keep the rewards the same, and maybe not give a card the duplicates through the tiers. But someone in the single RC tier should get the RC , the legendary pro, and the epic pro maybe. That way you are always getting a better reward for each tier. Even if they tighten up the tiers back to how they were, and just add the tier between RC and Legend.

I made a suggestion earlier that it should be changed as follows for the higher tiers...

#1: RC Pro, Playoff Pro, Playoff Support
#2 - #10: RC, Playoff Pro, Playoff Support
#11 - #25: RC, Playoff Pro, Legend Support
#26 - #50: RC, Playoff Single, Legend Support
#51 - #150: RC, Legendary Pro or Playoff Single, NO SUPPORT
#151 down - keep the same as now (don't fix what isn't broken)...

Reasoning - each tier is clearly better than the one before... you could make an argument about #50 vs #51 but CD believes single card of the higher tier > pro of the lower so this follows their reward struct somewhat.

As far as winning everything below, considering often time the cards are getting upgraded already, you gain by getting a higher tier (except this time the best card was in 151 - 650... not counting #1 with the RC Pro). In the past, it was fine because legendary pro (top card not count RC pro) went to the top 25 so the only argument really was 125 vs 126 (legendary + support vs RC only). Rest of the tiers clearly had the next one better than the previous.

[mrblazeakajb]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

I made a suggestion earlier that it should be changed as follows for the higher tiers...

#1: RC Pro, Playoff Pro, Playoff Support
#2 - #10: RC, Playoff Pro, Playoff Support
#11 - #25: RC, Playoff Pro, Legend Support
#26 - #50: RC, Playoff Single, Legend Support
#51 - #150: RC, Legendary Pro or Playoff Single, NO SUPPORT
#151 down - keep the same as now (don't fix what isn't broken)...

Reasoning - each tier is clearly better than the one before... you could make an argument about #50 vs #51 but CD believes single card of the higher tier > pro of the lower so this follows their reward struct somewhat.

As far as winning everything below, considering often time the cards are getting upgraded already, you gain by getting a higher tier (except this time the best card was in 151 - 650... not counting #1 with the RC Pro). In the past, it was fine because legendary pro (top card not count RC pro) went to the top 25 so the only argument really was 125 vs 126 (legendary + support vs RC only). Rest of the tiers clearly had the next one better than the previous.

Yeah I feel like the 2 previous RC events I had to grind so hard just for 1 lousy rival card that I can never ever pro. Granted it is an extremely rare card but the time you put in to finish in the 51-150(100 b4) is a complete waste. Especially for this event cause clearly it was a lot better off to rank in the Legendary Pro tier.

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

[Mookie31]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

I made a suggestion earlier that it should be changed as follows for the higher tiers...

#1: RC Pro, Playoff Pro, Playoff Support
#2 - #10: RC, Playoff Pro, Playoff Support
#11 - #25: RC, Playoff Pro, Legend Support
#26 - #50: RC, Playoff Single, Legend Support
#51 - #150: RC, Legendary Pro or Playoff Single, NO SUPPORT
#151 down - keep the same as now (don't fix what isn't broken)...

Reasoning - each tier is clearly better than the one before... you could make an argument about #50 vs #51 but CD believes single card of the higher tier > pro of the lower so this follows their reward struct somewhat.

As far as winning everything below, considering often time the cards are getting upgraded already, you gain by getting a higher tier (except this time the best card was in 151 - 650... not counting #1 with the RC Pro). In the past, it was fine because legendary pro (top card not count RC pro) went to the top 25 so the only argument really was 125 vs 126 (legendary + support vs RC only). Rest of the tiers clearly had the next one better than the previous.

I disagree with tier 50-150.. its too good.. the reason that its a dogfight to get to top 50 is because everybody wants that rc + playoff combo. i think the 50-150 tier should plainly just be a playoff card + leg support or even just a playoff card to me would suffice. Not as good as the leg pro but its upgradable.

[Denkiteki]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

I disagree with tier 50-150.. its too good.. the reason that its a dogfight to get to top 50 is because everybody wants that rc + playoff combo. i think the 50-150 tier should plainly just be a playoff card + leg support or even just a playoff card to me would suffice. Not as good as the leg pro but its upgradable.

Currently its RC + legend + support which is actually the same as before (only difference is RC v2 vs v1). There used to be a dog fight because of the legendary card you get as well as RC but there wasn't really much of a fight this time (there was a decent gap between 51 and 52 i think).

If you just give a playoff card in that tier, then you're suggesting only 50 RC cards... seems like CD have been expanding the number of RC card instead of decreasing that number. Also i was trying to create a clear advantage for each tier above the previous instead of a debatable advantage ('cause lets be honest, the odds of you ever pro'ing a playoff card without buying legendary pack is pretty low unless 2 or 3 more tiers are released... drafting legendary now isn't even common).

[ajezzy1]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Currently its RC + legend + support which is actually the same as before (only difference is RC v2 vs v1). There used to be a dog fight because of the legendary card you get as well as RC but there wasn't really much of a fight this time (there was a decent gap between 51 and 52 i think).

If you just give a playoff card in that tier, then you're suggesting only 50 RC cards... seems like CD have been expanding the number of RC card instead of decreasing that number. Also i was trying to create a clear advantage for each tier above the previous instead of a debatable advantage ('cause lets be honest, the odds of you ever pro'ing a playoff card without buying legendary pack is pretty low unless 2 or 3 more tiers are released... drafting legendary now isn't even common).

Yea I was number 52 and number 51 had me by 900 points but I would have been closer but I feel asleep with two hours left because I couldn't play a game because of waiting on network so I just called it quits

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

[Widebody23]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

You do know the gap between 151 - 650 wasn't all that big. A couple games could result in huge shifts (more so 350 down). There were server issues too or you would have dropped farther down...



Seriously if you wasted all that time to grind 7000 points... why not grind 1 more hour? Or at least get close to 150 than 650...

I honestly did the same **** I was 520 something with 2+hrs to go but my phone had 2% so I put it on the charger I came back 10 minutes later and couldn't get back on cause the server was messed up it finally let me play a game with 2mintues left smh... I wasted my time for no reason


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[JaviLo5]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Website updated!

Now with the cards of Rivals (Pro Walton, Walton, Playoffs Drexler) and others!

Remember that I can render screenshoots from opposite team cards if you post the picture in high quality (like I did with Rivals PRO Walton)

[Mayo]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

#2-25 should definitely be a Playoff Pro as a reward.

Thats the only reason i didnt shoot for top 20


Scooby Dewbie )

[CStarks]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

I honestly did the same **** I was 520 something with 2+hrs to go but my phone had 2% so I put it on the charger I came back 10 minutes later and couldn't get back on cause the server was messed up it finally let me play a game with 2mintues left smh... I wasted my time for no reason


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Tell me about it. Was trying to aim for a leg pro Drexler, but the game kept giving me errors.... smh. Thinking I should've gone for an epic pro Lillard instead. Could've been a better choice and not really a waste of time.

[CStarks]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

The game was pretty much trolling me the entire RC event. First 4 epics were all SF's (Kersey, Luol Deng, Rudy Gay SAC and Rudy Gay TOR) If they were gonna give me epic SF's, they could've at least given me 2 Rudy Gays that were the same team. Also got Bill Lambier, Andrew Bynum, Andre Igoudala and Tyreke Evans. The only card that was actually "worth it" from all my pulls was the Igoudala just because I'm a Warriors fan.

[Sebastianq28]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

This is getting really annoying...

[DaBaByBuLLs]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

The game was pretty much trolling me the entire RC event. First 4 epics were all SF's (Kersey, Luol Deng, Rudy Gay SAC and Rudy Gay TOR) If they were gonna give me epic SF's, they could've at least given me 2 Rudy Gays that were the same team. Also got Bill Lambier, Andrew Bynum, Andre Igoudala and Tyreke Evans. The only card that was actually "worth it" from all my pulls was the Igoudala just because I'm a Warriors fan.

OMG! Are you serious?

[darkyo666666]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Anyone knows if the increased drop rates are the same for rivals panels and normal qg panels?


Sent from my Nokia 920 using Tapatalk

[robthrees]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Anyone knows if the increased drop rates are the same for rivals panels and normal qg panels?


Sent from my Nokia 920 using Tapatalk

I got an epic in only like 50 games since Rc. So I think the drop rate is the same. Plus I got one at the end of RC, so it wasn't like I was overdue.

[Wreckingball]

Re: MyTeam Mobile Discussion

Anyone knows if the increased drop rates are the same for rivals panels and normal qg panels?


Sent from my Nokia 920 using Tapatalk

Its the same thing.