For those that used the Nuggets as an example:
The Nuggets won 50 games. That's with poor defense. That should show you how important offense is right there. IMO, I can't see how we can say it's 50/50 or defense>offense when a team that is pretty good offensively and very poor defensively gets 50 wins.
In the playoffs, they got beat by the Lakers. The Lakers are a better offensive team AND they play much better defense. That's why they were swept.
Last year, they got beat by the Spurs. The Spurs are a great defensive team. The Nuggets were still able to score 80-90 points per game. The Spurs are also a very good team offensively. It seems like people tend to forget that. They have THREE of the best playmakers in the league, and a coach that runs a damn good offense. As I stated earlier, people seem to forget that. So against the Nuggets, their offense was even more efficient.
If the Nuggets were in the East, they would rip through teams with their offense alone. So again, I can't see how one can say that they are equal.
A great defensive team is probably only going to drop another team's scoring about 10, and at their absolute best defensively, 20 points from their average.
Look at the Lakers and the Spurs. The Spurs are the better defensive team. Why aren't they winning if defense is better or they are equal? Because the Lakers offense has been so much better than the Spurs.
If your offense isn't playing well, your defense suffers. Period.
That's why I can't agree with 50/50...Or defense > offense.
That's why I say 70/30 offense... And 30% is a huge portion. Just like defense having a big importance in the game. It's just not as close as offense.
Comment