I was reading the game ranking review of COD2 ( http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/l...reviewid=639836)
And i saw this:
...What do you guys think, just saw on the left by the screens says multiplayer is 1-32 player...YES!
Some people have said its a PC review, but i circled the thing in red that make it a 360 review.
I posted this because the latest news on COD2 multiplayer said only 16 people..
Im very excited now, 32 is gonna be great
And i saw this:
Live gaming in Call of Duty 2 is class-based according to the weapon you select at the beginning of each round. There are no special abilities such as Air-Strikes, medics or ammo-distributions (although your grenade allocation will vary according to the weapon you choose), ensuring that no-one class has more of an advantage than any other. The weaponry is similarly, perfectly balanced with each particular firearm having its benefits and drawbacks according to the layout of each map. Sure, there are some stages that favour snipers over close range guns, and vice versa, but when there are 32 players involved in the fight it will always come down to whichever player has the most skill during each session. Is there any slow-down, visual downgrading, or lazy programming moments hidden away in the online portion of the game? Is the multiplayer less polished than the single player campaign? In what can only be described as a breath of fresh air, the answer is a resounding "No"...
...What do you guys think, just saw on the left by the screens says multiplayer is 1-32 player...YES!
Some people have said its a PC review, but i circled the thing in red that make it a 360 review.
I posted this because the latest news on COD2 multiplayer said only 16 people..
Im very excited now, 32 is gonna be great
Comment