So building off this thread: http://forums.operationsports.com/vB...d.php?t=234090 and also one I started on DSM http://www.digitalsportsmania.com/fo...d.php?t=177397 a bit ago I'm wondering what OS thinks about reviews.
Now I understand the history of OS reviews, where they usually come out quite a bit later -- that has started to change a bit in the last few months though I've noticed. And over at DSM we do our own type of thing that is somewhat different from OS in terms of how we handle reviews. Neither is wrong, neither is right, the bottom line is, I'm just looking for what people look for in reviews. Obviously everyone looks for something different but moving forward reviews at this site and DSM's will I think inevitably change a bit as we mix ideas together and so forth with each other. So moving forward I'm just listening for opinions. You can respond in this thread here and begin a new convo, or jump over to DSM and chime-in there where there is also an ongoing discussion.
I'll hold off for now posting my views on what I think the "best" review is and will just let this flow for now and take it all in.
Now I understand the history of OS reviews, where they usually come out quite a bit later -- that has started to change a bit in the last few months though I've noticed. And over at DSM we do our own type of thing that is somewhat different from OS in terms of how we handle reviews. Neither is wrong, neither is right, the bottom line is, I'm just looking for what people look for in reviews. Obviously everyone looks for something different but moving forward reviews at this site and DSM's will I think inevitably change a bit as we mix ideas together and so forth with each other. So moving forward I'm just listening for opinions. You can respond in this thread here and begin a new convo, or jump over to DSM and chime-in there where there is also an ongoing discussion.
I'll hold off for now posting my views on what I think the "best" review is and will just let this flow for now and take it all in.