JoshC1977s M15 Set

[JoshC1977]

Quote: Originally Posted by SuperSeahawks

Just finished the Super Bowl; it was one hell of a game which went to OT where we lost 32-30 to the Patriots. A lot of good things happening in this one as it went back and forth. Brady got rid of the football quickly as we had only 3 sacks today while Russell Wilson was sacked only twice. Our running game didn't show up as we ran for only 84 yards. The only thing I didn't like was that when a QB misses, they miss very badly. Regardless, really enjoyed this game and it was a nice Super Bowl (wish we could have won though). Have not made any changes from the original version 5 sliders with 35 PCI Total Yards: SEA 331 NE 478 Rush Yards: SEA 84 NE 114 Pass Yards: SEA 247 NE 364 TO's: SEA 1 NE 1 Sacks Allowed: SEA 2 NE 3 QB Stats: Brady 35 for 52 for 391 yards and a TD, 67% Wilson 19 for 35 for 259 yards and 3 TD's, 54%

Sounds like a great game....hopefully the real super bowl is that great of a game. Stats also look solid.

[Shady Mike]

Would you recommend any specific changes for someone playing 15 min quarters 15 sec runoff?

[JoshC1977]

Quote: Originally Posted by Shady Mike

Would you recommend any specific changes for someone playing 15 min quarters 15 sec runoff?

As long as you get the right number of plays (around 110-120), then no.

[thegame19991999]

Just played a game with your sliders overall. A good game I lost. To the broncos by 3
I had to many int and sacks I play with the patriots if that helps

[tc020791]

Honestly I dont see much of a change with the new IG find. For me sacks are almost solely based on the CPU run game, yes the run game.

If the CPU can run the ball and get themselves into 3rd & short or medium, the sacks stay at a normal level, maybe 1-3 a game. But if the CPU can't run the ball and gets into 3 & long they take too many coverage sacks for one dumb*** reason.

They call 4 verticals or something similar on 3 & long over 50% of the time I would guess. And just about every time they call that play they take a coverage sack.

If you get a 3rd & long and get a sack, before the next play check out the last play the CPU ran (it shows it right there on the left side of the play call screen). I would bet most times they called 4 verticals.

I really don't want to have to aid the CPU run game to keep them out of 3rd & long.

Does anyone know how to make the CPU play with a custom playbook without controlling all 32 teams?

[Neddy_87]

Ey josh just played first game with these and quality as always. Will play few more to decide if I like these for my playing style or one of ur earlier sets. Do you recommend any changes if I'm playing normal game speed in regards to threshold? Cheers mate

[mooch49]

Quote: Originally Posted by tc020791

Honestly I dont see much of a change with the new IG find. For me sacks are almost solely based on the CPU run game, yes the run game. If the CPU can run the ball and get themselves into 3rd & short or medium, the sacks stay at a normal level, maybe 1-3 a game. But if the CPU can't run the ball and gets into 3 & long they take too many coverage sacks for one dumb*** reason. They call 4 verticals or something similar on 3 & long over 50% of the time I would guess. And just about every time they call that play they take a coverage sack. If you get a 3rd & long and get a sack, before the next play check out the last play the CPU ran (it shows it right there on the left side of the play call screen). I would bet most times they called 4 verticals. I really don't want to have to aid the CPU run game to keep them out of 3rd & long. Does anyone know how to make the CPU play with a custom playbook without controlling all 32 teams?

Check out my thread. It's the only way you can get a cpu controlled team in CFM to use a custom playbook. It's a bit complicated at first and you need 2 controllers and 2 accounts, but it makes a world of difference.

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...books-ps4.html

[bjb2445]

Josh,

Does your set require rosters with modified qb traits? I've seen that on some other sets here.