Armor & Sword's All Pro Custom Simulation (15 Min Quarters) Style Sliders

[tdawg3782]

Gonna try to get my 1st preseason game in later tonight (using Denver). Hopefully around 8ish pst. Never used Twitch before to stream something I was playing but might as well since it's all setup to. Will post the link when I start. Going to be using the Gold 1.0 set on pg 1 plus the stuff A&S/JoshC are testing (35 thresh, 65 WR catch(cpu/hum), 40 qb acc(cpu/hum), 35 int(hum))

[JHedges2]

Just ran a play now game with settings as they are from the OP, playing as Green Bay on a windy night in Chicago.

Cutler was abysmal. The Bears were abysmal in general to be honest. Forte's numbers are deceiving, as he had a long of 74 (which was a bit wild--I had him wrapped up). So, removing that, he had 10 carries for 8 yards.

I was able to do pretty much what I wanted with Lacy, and Rodgers was on point on short 'west coast' passes. Box is as follows...

Green Bay Packers at Chicago Bears
Jan 1,	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
Green Bay Packers ()	14	6	7	17	44
Chicago Bears ()	3	7	0	7	17

Team Stats Comparison
	GNB	CHI
Total Offense	413	201
Rushing Yards	211	76
Passing Yards	202	125
First Downs	23	8
Punt Return Yards	22	6
Kick Return Yards	24	174
Total Yards	459	381
Turnovers	1	3
3rd Down Converstion	6/10	5/11
4th Down Conversion	0/0	0/0
2-Point Conversion	0/0	0/0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals	4/3	1/0
Penalties	3-15	2-46
Posession Time	31:28	16:32

Green Bay Packers PASSING C/A YDS TD INT A. Rodgers 17/26 202 3 1 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD E. Lacy 25 134 5.3 1 J. Starks 10 55 5.5 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD D. Adams 5 56 11.2 1 R. Cobb 3 15 5.0 1 J. Nelson 3 38 12.6 0

Chicago Bears PASSING C/A YDS TD INT J. Cutler 14/32 135 1 3 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD M. Forte 11 82 7.4 1 J. Rodgers 2 -6 -3.0 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD M. Bennett 3 8 2.6 0 M. Wilson 3 24 8.0 0 E. Royal 2 23 11.5 0

[VortexLaser]

Quote: Originally Posted by JHedges2

Just ran a play now game with settings as they are from the OP, playing as Green Bay on a windy night in Chicago. Cutler was abysmal. The Bears were abysmal in general to be honest. Forte's numbers are deceiving, as he had a long of 74 (which was a bit wild--I had him wrapped up). So, removing that, he had 10 carries for 8 yards. I was able to do pretty much what I wanted with Lacy, and Rodgers was on point on short 'west coast' passes. Box is as follows... Green Bay Packers at Chicago Bears Jan 1, 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH SCORE Green Bay Packers () 14 6 7 17 44 Chicago Bears () 3 7 0 7 17 Team Stats Comparison GNB CHI Total Offense 413 201 Rushing Yards 211 76 Passing Yards 202 125 First Downs 23 8 Punt Return Yards 22 6 Kick Return Yards 24 174 Total Yards 459 381 Turnovers 1 3 3rd Down Converstion 6/10 5/11 4th Down Conversion 0/0 0/0 2-Point Conversion 0/0 0/0 Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals 4/3 1/0 Penalties 3-15 2-46 Posession Time 31:28 16:32 Green Bay Packers PASSING C/A YDS TD INT A. Rodgers 17/26 202 3 1 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD E. Lacy 25 134 5.3 1 J. Starks 10 55 5.5 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD D. Adams 5 56 11.2 1 R. Cobb 3 15 5.0 1 J. Nelson 3 38 12.6 0 Chicago Bears PASSING C/A YDS TD INT J. Cutler 14/32 135 1 3 RUSHING ATT YDS AVG TD M. Forte 11 82 7.4 1 J. Rodgers 2 -6 -3.0 0 RECEIVING REC YDS AVG TD M. Bennett 3 8 2.6 0 M. Wilson 3 24 8.0 0 E. Royal 2 23 11.5 0

These sliders aren't meant for play now. There are meant for CF . Try them on there.

[Cpterp22]

Quote: Originally Posted by VortexLaser

These sliders aren't meant for play now. There are meant for CF . Try them on there.

Only crappy part about CFM right now is the rating boost are pushing scores up. But, testing them in CFM is better

[JHedges2]

Quote: Originally Posted by VortexLaser

These sliders aren't meant for play now. There are meant for CF . Try them on there.

Ugh--thanks.

I was under the impression they could be tested in play now, but the fatigue/subs were jacked up (which was evident), but if tested on CFM then player ratings were skewed...?

[tdawg3782]

Quote: Originally Posted by JHedges2

Ugh--thanks. I was under the impression they could be tested in play now, but the fatigue/subs were jacked up (which was evident), but if tested on CFM then player ratings were skewed...?

It's not a every game thing. I actually haven't seen it yet. So it should always happen (I don't think at least).

Sent from my Galaxy s4 so deal with the short hand

[tdawg3782]

Getting ready to broadcast on twitch:

www.twitch.tv/tdawg3782


Sent from my Galaxy s4 so deal with the short hand

[thelegitgoat]

I want to start a 32 team control cfm.is their a select all option or do I have physically select all 32 teams.please help