Statistics in sliders-Madden18 - Page 2 - Operation Sports Forums
Home

Statistics in sliders-Madden18

This is a discussion on Statistics in sliders-Madden18 within the Madden NFL Football Sliders forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Football Sliders
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-31-2017, 12:19 AM   #9
Pro
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

FG Acc testing: Set to 50yd attempt real world 60% made

Human: I can't miss more than 20% even at 0
CPU:
50: 90%
45: 80%
44: 60%
43: 60%
42: 70%
41: 60%
40: 50%
39: 50%
38: 30%

It would appear somewhere between 39-41 is likely accurate. I have chose 40.
Oraeon1224 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 08:26 AM   #10
Rookie
 
OVR: 0
Join Date: Dec 2004
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

Very nice sliders! Great job 👌🏽
b1rdman jr is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 06:32 PM   #11
Pro
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

Played a game vs GB. 134 total plays. Rush Yd 128 Hum 136 CPU. Pass yd 321 CPU 298 Hum. Sacks 2 Hum 3 CPU. Fumbles 1 CPU 0 Hum. QB 64% CPU 67% Hum. BTK 4 human 5 CPU. PDef 7 Hum 4 CPU. INT 1 human 0 CPU. WR drops 4 CPU 0 Hum.

Pass reaction is too high currently based on PDef will reduce to 80. This may improve CPU Comp%. Need more drops for human will decrease WR catch by 2.

Oraeon1224 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 08-31-2017, 08:01 PM   #12
That's top class!
 
extremeskins04's Arena
 
OVR: 1
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, Mass.
Posts: 3,328
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

Tried your sliders. Played a half in CFM before exiting.

Matt Stafford was 85% acc

DeShone Kizer was 73% acc.

With 5 minutes left in the first half, there were already 5 sacks for my side, and 4 for the CPU's. There were already 3 fumbles in the game, 0 int's though.

Last edited by extremeskins04; 08-31-2017 at 08:12 PM.
extremeskins04 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2017, 09:38 PM   #13
Pro
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

Quote:
Originally Posted by extremeskins04
Tried your sliders. Played a half in CFM before exiting.

Matt Stafford was 85% acc

DeShone Kizer was 73% acc.

With 5 minutes left in the first half, there were already 5 sacks for my side, and 4 for the CPU's. There were already 3 fumbles in the game, 0 int's though.
Then feel free to modify. My play calling may be different then yours and lower QB%. Similarly I may not be as good at passing. Also I mainly play safety and don't use the hit stick on tackles. Did you notice how many WR drops and PDef were in your game. Getting that right vastly improves QB%. Based on what you provided increase pass block, lower WR catch and lower QB Acc.

Sacks in general are where sliders seem to fail because the AI just isn't good
Oraeon1224 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2017, 07:57 PM   #14
Pro
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

After playing several CFM games it is completely different. Reading the Dev notes I realized the Coaching adaptive AI is only in this mode. In CFM there were Way too few drops (conservative catch by AI) and the AI QB Comp% went up as a result. Also my penalty sliders are off now. I have updated the front page but it will require testing too improve
Oraeon1224 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 10:11 AM   #15
MVP
 
King Gro23's Arena
 
OVR: 21
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

Just played 3 cfm games with these sliders I must say statically they all great besides a few issues. I am Chargers / Lions/ Panthers

- CPU run game (user rush reaction WAY TO SLOW)
CPU cj Anderson ran for 322 on 35 carries smh. Defense was not reacting to run until 5 yards past LOS & they were pulling themselves out of position. Blocks were glue-sticky like.
Top 3 factors imo
-Tackle slider
- pass reaction slider
- holding slider (betting on holding)


This picture should be Jarvis landry - stats aren't that bothersome besides its the 1st Q and I did the same thing with keenan Allen last game.
Finally seeing the press loss and wr deep ball b.s. easy TD.. Keenan Allen [user] had 6 for 249 & 3td

Pros: I do like number of deflections both user and cpu
Cons : I like how 40 threshold helps other areas of game. But its screwing up coverages.. Too many wins / losses resulting not enough counters and stalemates



Chargers and Denver combined for 35
1st Q points, final score ended up being 50-44 denver.
Pass game seemed real statically , Coverage could be better.. Overall through the games I felt points came to easy.

Only 5 punts in 2 games combined. With game 3 had 3 punts

Sent from my VS987 using Operation Sports mobile app
__________________
Catch Madden 15/ NBA 2k15 Footage on my Twitch Channel
TopShotGwaup15
http://www.twitch.tv/topshotgwaup15

Suscribe on Youtube
https://www.youtube.com/user/GleezyBaby43
Gleezybaby43
King Gro23 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2017, 01:19 PM   #16
Pro
 
OVR: 6
Join Date: Jul 2008
Re: Statistics in sliders-Madden18

Thanks for the feedback. I agree the rushing seems a bit out of wack. I will probably reduce run block for AI. I will also test to see if the other sliders. Effect the run game.

Also be aware your playcalling has a huge impact on run. Pay attention to CPU packages 22,21,12, and 13 packages should generally have cover 3 or cover 4 called. If you call cover 2 Mann or zone you are going to give up big runs in real life or madden unless you have an incredible line and LB.
Oraeon1224 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Football Sliders »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.

Top -