TDawg's Madden 20 XP Sliders

[tdawg3782]

Honestly don't know what to say on this guys. I haven't been playing very much and don't know if an update jacked anything up. I can tell you all the data you see is 100% accurate. But it was all done a month ago. If I get time I'll run a sim and see if anything has changed.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app

[HoundsOfHowl]

Quote: Originally Posted by tdawg3782

Honestly don't know what to say on this guys. I haven't been playing very much and don't know if an update jacked anything up. I can tell you all the data you see is 100% accurate. But it was all done a month ago. If I get time I'll run a sim and see if anything has changed. Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app

Thanks! I may run some 20 year sims and post results using your current sliders on current patch

[HoundsOfHowl]

This doesn't look as pretty as yours does Tdawg, but here is some updated sim from 10 & 20 year with current XP sliders on OP.

Note these don't include FA

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...t#gid=78658195

While I think everything matches up to what you posted. I feel there are a few things I'm personally going to boost to see a few different results.

I'll probably bump up QB +5, WR+5, TE +10, FS +10, MLB +7, OLB +3

Again, just personal preference, but I think your sliders are still spot on to OP.

[phillies6f]

Yeah I’m three years in and most CPU teams are like 75 overall


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[tdawg3782]

Quote: Originally Posted by phillies6f

Yeah I’m three years in and most CPU teams are like 75 overall Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

That's the average that of team Ovr when you start the game. Nothing unrealistic about that. The game starts with a bigger spread on player ratings this year. Don't get caught up in team Ovrs.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Operation Sports mobile app

[Rmiok222]

I’m sorry for this silly question but in the OP where it says “aestis 32 user CFM” is that what we’re using in a CFM? Or is it something else? There’s a lot of images that aren’t loading for me and I see through the page on this thread where you were testing as high as 170% on some positions. Just making sure I have the right xp values


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[HoundsOfHowl]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rmiok222

I’m sorry for this silly question but in the OP where it says “aestis 32 user CFM” is that what we’re using in a CFM? Or is it something else? There’s a lot of images that aren’t loading for me and I see through the page on this thread where you were testing as high as 170% on some positions. Just making sure I have the right xp values Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

The aestis ones are for a 32 user cfm

[Steely McBeam]

First franchise through I stopped about 2025 because things felt off due to both XP sliders and game play sliders leading to some wackiness.



Second franchise through I am in year 2041. I play season opener, closer then 3 home division games one year and the away games the next. I sim wildcard and division rounds if I make playoffs. Summary I play 5 regular season games and sim the rest until conference champ.


Every five years I would scroll down the roster for the NFL to find where the overall rating of the #32 rated player is to determine the quality of the worst starters (if there was an even spread of talent). I have consistently upped the XP sliders virtually all the way through and I think ultimately they will look like the below. MLB and CB were the keys ones that had to change. A dearth of talent at these positions resulted in situations where teams lacked depth (MLB2 and CB2 and CB3) would be similar or worse in ratings to WR2, 3 and 4 and would routinely shred them. A CB rated 73 is a much worse player with my sliders than a 73 rated WR. I couldn't find a fix that wouldn't supercharge 80+ rated corners into interception shutdown machines.


QB 115
HB 145
FB 125
WR 135
TE 175
T 155
G 150
C 185
DE 160
DT 175
MLB 115
OLB 120
CB 115
FS 125
SS 125
K 115
P 115