|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by sbattisti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing my exploration of the confidence feature, QB Devonte Dansby has now led the Eagles to a 9-5 record in his second year, following a 0-3 start on the heels of a 1-15 campaign last year that left him at zero confidence to start the season. They currently share the division lead with the Redskins.
I have never done any confidence related game preparation. I don't have his stats in front of me right now, but he continues to be more of a game manager than anything else. I think he is somewhere around 3000 yards, 15 touchdowns, and 13 interceptions.
Given these average stats, combined with the lack of game prep, but factoring in the division lead, and going 9-2 in their last 11, you would think he would at least have moderate confidence. Nope. His confidence is a whopping 16.
So, I still think there is a lot of room to tweak the confidence algorithm. I'm not saying he should be a 95 or anything like that. But the system should probably take more into account about the overall team performance. I mean, if you are on a winning team, or even a losing team that is performing above expectations, I would think that most of your players should have at least average confidence, unless they're doing truly awful things. While Dansby certainly doesn't have them dusting off a spot in the Hall of Fame yet, he is winning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am going to slightly disagree with this. If he started at 0 and is now at 16 that is a pretty good improvement. If he was at 50 confidence he would be at 66 right now. So looking only at his season, it has been good enough to result in a +16 to confidence. That seems fair to me
This raises another question: How much should confidence carry over year to year?
Now for the tough part. OP it is on you for not managing the kids confidence.No excuse for your starting QB to start the year with 0 confidence. tsk tsk
(I know if you don't do it the AI does it for you. You still get a tsk tsk for that though)
Now to semi hijack the thread because this is related but I don't know if it deserves its own thread.
Year 1 with the Ravens. We finished 12-4 and Joe was the frontrunner for MVP in week 14 before going down with an injury. He was only sacked ~25 times. Those are great numbers especially considering how often I had him drop back. The bad part: The run game was just as bad as it was last season in real life. So can't run block for crap, pass protection excellent.
The dilemma: Entering year 2 all my lineman have 90+ confidence. They all get boosts to ratings, run block included. Because of this, run game is pretty damn good.
Thoughts? I am undecided. I see both sides of this.