I mean I think I understand the concept. Teams that only want to keep a player around for 1 more year without signing them to a longer term deal will use the Franchise Tag.
Right?
The issue I have is, why? Normally franchise tagging a player takes a big chunk out of your cap room that you need to sign your players in the offseason whether it's resigning players that are on your current roster, signing FA's or even your top draft picks.
So can explain to me why I would even want to franchise tag a player where it costs a lot to do it? Why not just sign that player to a 2-3 year shorter term deal and save some money?
Maybe I'm not understanding the significance right. Can someone help?
Right?
The issue I have is, why? Normally franchise tagging a player takes a big chunk out of your cap room that you need to sign your players in the offseason whether it's resigning players that are on your current roster, signing FA's or even your top draft picks.
So can explain to me why I would even want to franchise tag a player where it costs a lot to do it? Why not just sign that player to a 2-3 year shorter term deal and save some money?
Maybe I'm not understanding the significance right. Can someone help?
Comment