Weird regression issue in CFM

[Robo COP]

Quote: Originally Posted by The JareBear

So I just got bit. In year 2 of SOS we accidentally simmed a week too far and after the sim week my qb (Osweiler) lost 5 awareness points. It seems to have brought him back to where he started at beginning of season, or maybe that's a coincidence?

this was one of my possible theories as well. That for some reason guys get defaulted back to what they started at. I may be wrong about this, but it also seems like most people who bring this up as an issue are experiencing it in online CFMs?

[The JareBear]

Quote: Originally Posted by Robo COP

this was one of my possible theories as well. That for some reason guys get defaulted back to what they started at. I may be wrong about this, but it also seems like most people who bring this up as an issue are experiencing it in online CFMs?

Ill have to investigate the other guys in my league and see if the players who regressed last season randomly only regressed to where they started from

[The JareBear]

So I've been hit three times

We are still in regular season year 2

First I was hit with an awareness regression for Brock after a sim loss, brought him back down to here he started the season. Then I was hit with a deep accuracy loss after a loss on the road to Jacksonville where Brock had four turnovers but also accounted for 6 TDs (wild game).

Just had another hit. Win on the road in San Diego and Brock went from 96 injury to 92. He was sacked 6x. I haven't put any points into injury so it seems extra random, unless taking sacks is designed to lower injury and this is working as intended?

Very strange. A little frustrating. I'm considering drafting a qb even tho I have put almost two seasons of game prep into Brock. The regressions are just kinda buzzkill.

Note, it's happening instantly, like right after the games, not even happening during advance.

Any thoughts on this? Is it a glitch this year? Maybe tied to coach type or triggered by using a custom roster or something? Just totally random?

[Ueauvan]

year 4, cfm started after patch 2. hyde ran for 150+ yds a couple of 30 yd runs 2 tds 0 fumbles and lost 1 bcv again this is week 5. this is getting stupid

[ronlove]

Quote: Originally Posted by Robo COP

That's what I am wondering too. It seems to be backup/mediocre type QBs that people are building up to be really good that take this hit too. It's like the game is looking at it and is like "this guy isn't supposed to be this good. Let's fix it"

This is how it looks. I have Matt Stafford in online CFM and it has happened multiple times. Right at the end of the regular season. He lost like 10 MAC before the playoffs. I worked 2 seasons to get his acc up and lost MAC when the playoffs hit. This is the 3rd post season of our Cfm. I was watching carefully the first 2 seasons and no regression. I thought the issue might have been fixed. But I didn't make the playoffs. This season I made the playoff, after my wild card game, I noticed he'd lost 11 Mac (I didn't check before the game, but had to happen between week 16 and wildcard week.) definitely some kind of glitch. Stafford had over 4000 yds passing and over 100 qbr.

[juggalotusx]

CFM is so broke this year I cant even get into it and I want to so bad but won't because it angers me so much, all the stupid things that happen with regression , I have done lots of testing and always the same garbage.
They have made this game for online gamblers now with there Mut casino. Why do you think there are so many game modes surrounding building teams with pack cards?

[Ueauvan]

2nd year as browns owner changed trainer to world class

mckinnon runs for 130 yds 17yds 2 tds 0 fum 3 rec 1 rec td
loses 1 awr the week after in mid season so it isnt the trainer ...

[ajra21]

Quote: Originally Posted by juggalotusx

CFM is so broke this year I cant even get into it and I want to so bad but won't because it angers me so much, all the stupid things that happen with regression , I have done lots of testing and always the same garbage.

working great for me. no regression that is not realistic in older players.