Madden NFL 22 Player Ratings - Top Running Backs and Tight Ends

[Steve_OS]

Madden NFL 22 player ratings continue to be revealed throughout the week. Today it’s all about...

Written By: Steve Noah

Click here to view the article.

[PhillyPhanatic14]

#4-10 all seem high lol. Maybe we're seeing a swing back on the ratings spread to overrate guys again. I am an Eagles fan and even I wouldn't rate Goedert above the 78-80 range.

[kjwill22]

Quote: Originally Posted by PhillyPhanatic14

#4-10 all seem high lol. Maybe we're seeing a swing back on the ratings spread to overrate guys again. I am an Eagles fan and even I wouldn't rate Goedert above the 78-80 range.

Nope I actually think goedert is good where he’s at


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[PhillyPhanatic14]

Quote: Originally Posted by kjwill22

Nope I actually think goedert is good where he’s at Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

He only had 500 yds and 3 TDs last year... I don't see how that justifies mid 80's. Unless they're going back to the old ratings system where average starters are rated in the mid 80's, bench players in the 70's, etc... For a year or two though they did a great job of spreading the ratings out.

[XtremeDunkz]

Quote: Originally Posted by PhillyPhanatic14

He only had 500 yds and 3 TDs last year... I don't see how that justifies mid 80's. Unless they're going back to the old ratings system where average starters are rated in the mid 80's, bench players in the 70's, etc... For a year or two though they did a great job of spreading the ratings out.

They are probably assuming a big leap with the lower role of Ertz.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

[PhillyPhanatic14]

CMac who played 3 games in 2020 rated higher than Henry who rushed for 2,000 yards is just rough lol.

[roadman]

Quote: Originally Posted by PhillyPhanatic14

CMac who played 3 games in 2020 rated higher than Henry who rushed for 2,000 yards is just rough lol.

Swami and Equipt Guru have been pounding it pretty hard the last few days that injuries are not considered a part of the ratings, it's based on performances on the field only.

As much as I am a homer for Tonyan, Swami explained his rating is lower because he isn't a good blocker and his route routing isn't good.

Good enough for me.

More from Swami on Henry

Henry has 9 fumbles the past two seasons (still 94 carry due to carry numbers)
- He doesn't face more stacked boxes than other top players (or greater blocker disadvantage)
- He was second in yards after contact per attempt (behind Chubb)
- 13th in MT forced/A
- Henry's agility/change of direction hurt his OVR for obvious reasons.
- He is a one track runner (only 10% of his carries change in point of attack, which is 48th among RBs) which speaks to his excellent blocking.
- He offers nothing in the receiving game

[PhillyPhanatic14]

Quote: Originally Posted by roadman

Swami and Equipt Guru have been pounding it pretty hard the last few days that injuries are not considered a part of the ratings, it's based on performances on the field only. As much as I am a homer for Tonyan, Swami explained his rating is lower because he isn't a good blocker and his route routing isn't good. Good enough for me. More from Swami on Henry Henry has 9 fumbles the past two seasons (still 94 carry due to carry numbers) - He doesn't face more stacked boxes than other top players (or greater blocker disadvantage) - He was second in yards after contact per attempt (behind Chubb) - 13th in MT forced/A - Henry's agility/change of direction hurt his OVR for obvious reasons. - He is a one track runner (only 10% of his carries change in point of attack, which is 48th among RBs) which speaks to his excellent blocking. - He offers nothing in the receiving game

I have no problem with CMac at 97 but Henry deserves to be elevated above that. I also have no idea at all how CMac misses nearly the entire year with multiple injuries and ends up with a 96 injury rating? At some point missing an entire season should drop you down.