First off you do realize that this is a forum? Meaning no one gives a $%# about spelling or grammar.
Warner has had his years, but he was inconsistant for the past 5. Ya thats what I mean inconsistant. YOu see how they played against the packers, then look how they played against the saints. The year before they played incredible on the east coast in the playoffs, while they didnt win a game their in the regular season.
Fact is Warners a Hall of Famer, Delhomme or Garcia are not. Warner was good for about 5 seasons mabeyy 6, but was inconsistant for the next 5. Garcia has been alright were ever hes gone, while delhomme had 3 seasons were he was good.
Any ways back to the point Matt Moore is completly unproven in the NFL at this point, no one really knows if he will do good or bad. THe fact is no one knows how clausen will do either, same as bradford, stafford, and every other young qb.
Moore could be in the UFL nexxt year for all we know, while he could be a probowler as well.
Basicly meaning you really cant rate a guy high, if you dont know how hes going to play. College is far different from the NFL. Look at Brohm, Flynne, Brennan, harrington, carr, Russell, and alot more players. More less, Moore probaly shouldnt be higher than 75, as he is completly unproven at this point.