|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by xian11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I get it. Some people are tall and have length, which compensates for leaping ability.
Danario Alexander is blessed with all the above, which is why he is such a great red zone threat when healthy.
At this point, you're simply comparing your scouting reports with mine.
You say that little can be inferred fromadjectives in the CBS Sports report, but the bold parts of the scouting report you endorse are somehow indicative of anything to the contrary.
"Doesn't possess a clear second gear to accelerate and separate." Separate from whom? Brandon Browner or Stanford Routt? It's always going to be vague when there's no numbers.
I'm saying that when no quantity exists, that should not necessarily be the end of the road.
Players with long strides usually have less acceleration ("burst") than players with shorter strides. That's about all you can see from that youtube clip; Ike Taylor is more explosive than Demaryius Thomas -- no arguments here.
Concerning that "flawed" 4.38 figure: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...mas/index.html
Does video evidence mean anything?
|
|
|
|
|
|
You have to take anything sent from an agent/player during training with a HUGE grain of salt man. Unless they run it at a BLESCO or team-organized event where our scouts are present, we don't publish the time. That article states that the times were taken during his training, most likely not electronically, and even more likely by only one person with a stop watch one time. At the combine and pro days, for example, you have SEVERAL scouts taking times. Some take averages, some drop the fastest and slowest and average the rest. Each time a player runs they actually get 3 times (so a maximum of 6). NFLDS posts the best verifiable time. In fact, did you know that the timer can actually BREAK during the run, in which the electronic start is re-adjusted and the final time compensated for?
It's quite obvious we can have preferences on sources. The sources I choose are chosen because they are a service, independent of the media. Sure we have guys who write articles to publish (Chad Reuter and Rob Rang), but we do not publish for the sake of publishing. Our contracts with CBS Sports and Lindy's are examples of them asking permission to use our data and do whatever they wish with it. We only use primary source material as well...no secondhand stuff published under our copyrights.
Due to the preference of the source material and the methodology, I cannot argue any further in regards to these two players. I outlined the process and the problems we face when data is lacking. The cool thing about Madden is that you can now edit a player any way you want. If you are not satisfied with the ratings we produce for the game, you can change them. I am quite cool with that.
Now let's try to get back on topic here...if you have any further questions about the ratings process and not about the rosters, I will refer you to the FBG Ratings thread or my PM inbox.