OS Collaborative Slider Project

[CorporatePolicy]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlyBelle

Last game, the highest CPU pancake total for a linemen was 5. I didn't check them all since pancakes are not a high priority for me. My highest human lineman had 4. I'll make sure to check them all the next time.

Thank for that. I could really care less about them too, but i didn't always want my offensive linemen to be all pro every year in my franchise.

If you could check your pancake totals...that would be great. thanks. I appreciate it.

[CorporatePolicy]

Quote: Originally Posted by 03MstGT290

I'm going to try these out and will give you the results. Hopefully it will work. The only thing I want fixed is the pancakes total, all other things are great.

Great, thanks. Let me know how it goes. I'll think you'll like these a lot.

[03MstGT290]

Quote: Originally Posted by CorporatePolicy

Great, thanks. Let me know how it goes. I'll think you'll like these a lot.

I'm still having problems

So I wrote down my sliders and your sliders next to each other on paper. I'm going to try and blend them together and see what I can come up with. Even with CPU Knockdowns and Interceptions at zero, I'm still throwing INTs and the DBs are knocking the passes down. So I may keep it that way but maybe raise the Knockdowns a click. I'm going to try and lower Pass Blocking and Run Blocking for both Human and CPU to cut pancakes down. Also lower both Run Ability 2 or 3 clicks.

[SlyBelle]

Just finished latest game. Pitt (me) vs. Raiders(CPU)

Actually good finish. I was driving late. Got to the Raiders 30, but my pass was intercepted, game over.

Raiders won 21-13.

Sacks
Human sacked CPU (3)
CPU Sacked Human (2)

Pancakes
Human (7 lineman listed) 9,8,8,7,6,2,1
CPU (8 lineman listed) 4,3,2,1,1,1,1,1

Mine maybe a little high, but not unheard of. I'm OK with the results.

Only major change I made was increase CPU block to 2. I've changed the special teams sliders a bit but those should not matter.

Still not doing well with human passing. Too many INTs, but once again, I tend to try and squeeze the ball in. Need to have patience.

Running game for both seems very reasonable. Raiders had about 114 hards rushing, Pitt had about 105. Pitt had to abandon the run late to try and catch up.

[03MstGT290]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlyBelle

Just finished latest game. Pitt (me) vs. Raiders(CPU) Actually good finish. I was driving late. Got to the Raiders 30, but my pass was intercepted, game over. Raiders won 21-13. Sacks Human sacked CPU (3) CPU Sacked Human (2) Pancakes Human (7 lineman listed) 9,8,8,7,6,2,1 CPU (8 lineman listed) 4,3,2,1,1,1,1,1 Mine maybe a little high, but not unheard of. I'm OK with the results. Only major change I made was increase CPU block to 2. I've changed the special teams sliders a bit but those should not matter. Still not doing well with human passing. Too many INTs, but once again, I tend to try and squeeze the ball in. Need to have patience. Running game for both seems very reasonable. Raiders had about 114 hards rushing, Pitt had about 105. Pitt had to abandon the run late to try and catch up.

Sounds like you had a great game, close call at the end. The only thing that needs to be fixed are the pancakes, but overall good game.

[SlyBelle]

Just curious, what do people feel are good pancake numbers to have?

[CorporatePolicy]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlyBelle

Just finished latest game. Pitt (me) vs. Raiders(CPU) Actually good finish. I was driving late. Got to the Raiders 30, but my pass was intercepted, game over. Raiders won 21-13. Sacks Human sacked CPU (3) CPU Sacked Human (2) Pancakes Human (7 lineman listed) 9,8,8,7,6,2,1 CPU (8 lineman listed) 4,3,2,1,1,1,1,1 Mine maybe a little high, but not unheard of. I'm OK with the results. Only major change I made was increase CPU block to 2. I've changed the special teams sliders a bit but those should not matter. Still not doing well with human passing. Too many INTs, but once again, I tend to try and squeeze the ball in. Need to have patience. Running game for both seems very reasonable. Raiders had about 114 hards rushing, Pitt had about 105. Pitt had to abandon the run late to try and catch up.

Thanks for that...that really helped!

[03MstGT290]

Quote: Originally Posted by SlyBelle

Just curious, what do people feel are good pancake numbers to have?

I have been trying to find the statistics for that on nfl.com or espn.com....couldn't be found anywhere...

I would say maybe at least between 20 and 30?

I mean, really I do not pay attention to pancakes total but I do not want to have a whole starting linemen on the Pro Bowl from a same team lol