Coaching schemes needed POST Patch #2

[JaymeeAwesome]

What if you were to place the RB splits as 50/50 and take down aggression by 10 on all teams? I don't have ps3 but I want to be able to jump right in when it comes for 360.

Run/Pass 50/50
Aggressiveness at 60 for all teams; NE, NO, AZ, and SD at 80
RB2/RB1 50/50

How does that look? Can anyone sim a season with that and tell me how it comes out?

[RayAllen20]

Quote: Originally Posted by KBLover

Ugh - I'll just live with the stats whatever they are. I'd rather the AI run MORE and have a run game that's more realistic, than to get even LESS running game from the AI.

KBLover I understand your complaint but all you have to do is change ONCE you play that team. For example, if you play a run-heavy team like the Panthers change it to 30, and then after the game change it back to 60. Not too big of a deal.

[BroMontana82]

could we maybe get an organized list of all the teams and their coaching sliders on the first post so we can easily reference everything and the changes? maybe this could combine the coaching sliders along with RB1/RB2 priority as well.

it seems like putting teams more towards pass lowers total yards but doesn't effect YPC?

[Mike Lowe]

Quote: Originally Posted by angels28

I am controlling all 32 teams and did the following adjustments: I have injuries on Offensive schemes **Went back and changed all teams to 50/50 split run/pass ratio** **Aggressiveness at 70 for all teams; NE, NO, AZ, and SD at 90** **Had all rb's at 60/40 splits** Had 1 4,000 yd QB- most was Rodgers 4075 Had 22 1,000 yd Rushers-most was 2279 Peterson(3 above 1500) Had 17 1,000 yd WRs-most was D Mason at 1433 ( Qb TDs 35 for p. manning, 34 M ryan, 32 Rodgers, 30 Brady Rush TDs 24 Peterson, 15 for Rice and MJD Wr TDs 14 housh, 13 mason **Only 2 wrs had 100 catches**

Very close here Angel. I wanted to go in and compare team stats. I'm in a rush right now, but basically you are a bit high in rushing yardage totals. The good news, is that you are under for passing yards so I think setting teams to 60 for passing would look better (maybe more?).

In a nutshell, the high end of team rushing, in the test season I ran with your settings, was about 200 over the 2008 numbers. Not a huge deal (Vikings). The problem was that the low end was ahead by over 600 yards. The worst rushing team in the league ran for 1600 yards.

To counter this, the highest passing yardage with your settings was 4200 by NE. In real life 2008 this number was just under 5000. 4200, in real life, was the 4th place team when compared to tops in Madden with your settings.

The bottom end of passing had the Raiders pass for just over 2000 yards which is very low. Worst team in 2008 real life: The Raiders with just under 2400.

I think you're onto something though!

FWIW, I haven't noticed aggression doing anything in regards to sim stats. Not sure though.

[Mike Lowe]

Not sure what to do about sacks against though...high was 83 for a team against. In real life 2008, that number was 55.

If we increase passing, those numbers will increase. Maybe aggression does work? We need to protect those QB's more!

[angels28]

Quote: Originally Posted by jaymee13

What if you were to place the RB splits as 50/50 and take down aggression by 10 on all teams? I don't have ps3 but I want to be able to jump right in when it comes for 360. Run/Pass 50/50 Aggressiveness at 60 for all teams; NE, NO, AZ, and SD at 80 RB2/RB1 50/50 How does that look? Can anyone sim a season with that and tell me how it comes out?

just ran it through

most passing yds 3939-brees

most tds 37 brady, no one else over 31

peterson-1802, 4 more over 1500
total over 24 over 1,000

fitz 103 in catches
no one else over 100

fits 1512 yds, 16 total over 1000

fitz 22 tds, no one else over 14

TEAM vikings 3149 -rushing
dolphins 2668-rushing
BOTTOM 2
bears-1,405-rushing
seahawks-1436-rushing

TEAM PASSING
saints 4,123
pats 3930
BOTTOM 2
vikings 2513
bears 2523

[Mike Lowe]

Hmmm, still too much rushing IMO.

[JaymeeAwesome]

With teamwork we can get these stats to work....we're almost there