Charter04's Simulation Fast speed sliders

[charter04]

This is version 2 (Post Patch) *For franchise mode

I had a theory. I wanted to see what would happen if I started everything skill slider on 0 and raise what needed to be raised with testing. I assumed that the players would play more realistically. I think I am right! I thought the game played much better and it was easier to make adjustments to the skill of the CPU or player. Maybe someone has already done this but, here is my attempt. This is a work in progress.

I don't have any house rules. * I use the no switch rule. It's helps things be more realistic. I play Sim style and that is what these are for.
Please leave box scores and feedback.

Changes in RED

Game Flow-Optional (I call my on play's) Just keep from cheesing!
Game Speed-Fast/Player Speed Threshold-25
Game Clock-13 Minutes/20 seconds minimum play clock time. There should be 120 to 130 combined plays

Penalties-All Penalties at 100 accept False Start-55, Holding-55, Clipping-54, Face Mask-55, Roughing The Passer-54

Injuries-50
Fatigue-60
AUTO SPRINT-Off/Optional (I like to control when my player sprints)
AUTO Strafe- OFF

OFFENSE
QBA-20/65-80 (65 works for me)
Pass Block-0/0
WR Catch-30/35

Broken Tackles-0/0
Run Block-5/5
Fumbles-10/10

DEFENSE
Pass Reaction Time-0/0
INT-20/20
Pass Rush-10/0

Run Reaction Time-0/0
Block Shed-0/0
Tackle-0/10

SPECIALS TEAMS
FG Power-45
FG Accuarcy-50
Punt Power-50
Punt Accuarcy-75
Kick Off Power-55


AUTO SUBS

OFFENSE QB OUT-5
QB IN-20
RB OUT-85
RB IN-88
WR OUT-70
WR IN-80
FB/TE OUT-40
FB/TE IN-55
OL OUT-5
OL IN-20

DEFENSE DT OUT-80
DT IN-85
DE OUT-75
DE IN-80
LB OUT-70
LB IN-75
CB OUT-60
CB IN-70
S OUT-60
S IN-70

[charter04]

Played a game with these and it played really well. It was a defensive struggle but I have had games that were an offensive games too.
Cowboys (Me) vrs. Vikings (CPU)
17 to 16
Total offense: 272-247
Rushing : 73-145
Passing: 199-102
First downs: 14-15
Turnovers: 1-1
Penalties: 1-4
Plays: 59-54=113 (a little lower than I would like)
Romo : 89.3 Rating 20-29 68% 227 yards 1TD 1 INT 7.8 AVG 40 Long
McNabb 54.4 Rating 16-29 55% 144 yards 0 TD 1 INT 4.9 AVG 32 Long
F.Jones(Got Inj in the First Half) 7 ATT 33 Yards 4.7 avg 1 TD
T.Choice 20att 46 yards 2.3 avg 0 td
A. Peterson 13 att 60 yds 4.6 avg 1 td
T. Gerhart 6 att 36 yds 6.0avg 0 td
McNabb 3 att 35 yds
D. Bryant 7 rec 120 yds 17.1 avg 0 td
Really had a fun game. I used gameflow the whole game. I wish the Vikings would have ran Peterson more. They threw the ball a lot at the beginning of the game.
The problem that I still don’t have a solution for is the CPU QB’s problem getting screen passing off in time. I only had 2 sacks other than on screens. Sometimes they do great and sometimes just terrible.
fficeffice" />>>

[cp22]

Sorry I played a game using these then went to a bar to watch the game, and my brother turned off the xbox. I was going to post a box score. Anyways I was the Packers playing the Saints. I won 65-28. I had a lot of sacks on Brees. I think the high scoring had to do with the time of the game. It seemed to take a long time using 11 min and 25 sec runoff. I will play more games tomorrow and provide boxscores.

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by cp22

Sorry I played a game using these then went to a bar to watch the game, and my brother turned off the xbox. I was going to post a box score. Anyways I was the Packers playing the Saints. I won 65-28. I had a lot of sacks on Brees. I think the high scoring had to do with the time of the game. It seemed to take a long time using 11 min and 25 sec runoff. I will play more games tomorrow and provide boxscores.

Do you happen to know how many plays you, the CPU, and the total number? It should be 120 to 130 combined.

I was thinking there were to many user sacks too. Try to use a bad team against a good team. Or other combos like that. I just got beat 41 to 17. I was Dallas and played Atlanta. Maybe I just suck.

[charter04]

Played another game with these and really liked the results. I was Dallas and played against Atlanta. I lost 41 to 17. This was because I played terrible. I was terrrible against the run. Turner had 32 att for 225 yards. He had a run of 80+ and got caught by T. Newman. I had to play 8 in the box to stop the run and Matt Ryan had a field day. This is what I want though. I want the CPU to be hard to beat. My offense just made to many mistakes.

The only problem I had was the user sacks. I raised the CPU pass blocking. The CPU really struggles to get screen passes off before the sack. I took a lot of sacks but I held on to the ball to long. With my slidders I have had about 3 seconds to get a pass off. Sometimes a little more, sometimes a little less.

If you take the correct drop with you QB for the route you want to hit you can get the ball off in time. 3 step for short routes. 5 for medium and 7 for long. This works like it should.

PA passes work when you set it up with the run. Sometimes even when you haven't. I got sacked on my first play of the game. Gameflow called a PA pass. Would have worked but the CPU blitzed a CB.

[cp22]

San Diego Chargers at Oakland Raiders
Sep 9, 2011	1ST	2ND	3RD	4TH	SCORE
San Diego Chargers ()	7	14	0	3	24
Oakland Raiders ()	0	6	0	10	16

Team Stats Comparison
	SDG	OAK
Total Offense	310	412
Rushing Yards	69	134
Passing Yards	241	278
First Downs	14	17
Punt Return Yards	0	15
Kick Return Yards	0	110
Total Yards	310	537
Turnovers	0	4
3rd Down Converstion	3/8 37%	6/12 50%
4th Down Conversion	0/0	0/1
2-Point Conversion	0	0
Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals	1/1	1/1
Penalties	3-15	5-48
Posession Time	23:10	24:50

San Diego Chargers

Oakland Raiders

Good game. Every interception I threw was my fault. I only had 3 sacks on Rivers this game. I used 12 min/15 sec runoff. I just prefer that. The amount of plays seemed good. I don't have time to do player stats but they looked really good for everyone. I was Oakland btw.

[charter04]

Quote: Originally Posted by cp22

San Diego Chargers at Oakland Raiders Sep 9, 2011 1ST 2ND 3RD 4TH SCORE San Diego Chargers () 7 14 0 3 24 Oakland Raiders () 0 6 0 10 16 Team Stats Comparison SDG OAK Total Offense 310 412 Rushing Yards 69 134 Passing Yards 241 278 First Downs 14 17 Punt Return Yards 0 15 Kick Return Yards 0 110 Total Yards 310 537 Turnovers 0 4 3rd Down Converstion 3/8 37% 6/12 50% 4th Down Conversion 0/0 0/1 2-Point Conversion 0 0 Red Zone Touchdowns/Field Goals 1/1 1/1 Penalties 3-15 5-48 Posession Time 23:10 24:50 San Diego Chargers Oakland Raiders Good game. Every interception I threw was my fault. I only had 3 sacks on Rivers this game. I used 12 min/15 sec runoff. I just prefer that. The amount of plays seemed good. I don't have time to do player stats but they looked really good for everyone. I was Oakland btw.

Great! That looks pretty good. I know losing is something no one likes but, I like it when trying to get realistic results. Were there any problem area's that you could see?

[charter04]

I had a very good game with these. I played as the Raiders vrs. the Browns. I think I am getting some where with these.